Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions to ChatGPT about casting one's worries on God — A demonstation of ChatGPT's performance. (vanity)

Posted on 12/21/2024 7:19:41 AM PST by RoosterRedux

I thought some of you might be interested in this.

I have lots of conversations with ChatGPT about many different issues. Though I am curious about its responses, I am also curious about how well it can figure out what I am asking if I use terse prompts.

Here's a conversation I had with ChatGPT about turning one’s worries and concerns over to Jesus. I intentionally kept my questions short and vague.

My question:

In Christianity, we are told to turn all our worries and concerns over to Jesus. This would mean that we not only stop worrying about things but also clear our consciences of those things. How does this compare to the lack of conscience of a sociopath?

ChatGPT's response:

The Christian teaching of turning worries and concerns over to Jesus and the lack of conscience in a sociopath appear similar on the surface in that they both involve a lack of worry or burden about certain things. However, the underlying motivations, processes, and outcomes are profoundly different:

Christian Teaching: Trust in Jesus

  1. Foundation in Faith and Relationship:

  2. Clear Conscience Through Repentance and Forgiveness:

  3. Ethical and Moral Accountability:

  4. Outcome:

Sociopathy: Lack of Conscience

  1. Absence of Empathy and Moral Framework:

  2. No Concept of Accountability:

  3. Manipulation and Self-Centeredness:

  4. Outcome:

While both involve a lack of preoccupation with guilt or worry, the Christian practice is an act of faith aimed at moral and spiritual transformation, while the sociopath’s lack of concern stems from a deficit in moral and emotional capacities.

My question:

Does the continual turning over of worries and concerns to Jesus increase the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in that person? How are the 2 related?

ChatGPT's response:

Yes, the continual turning over of worries and concerns to Jesus can be deeply connected to an increase in the indwelling and work of the Holy Spirit in a person. Here’s how the two are related:

  1. Trust and Surrender as a Path to Spiritual Growth

  2. Increased Sensitivity to the Holy Spirit

  3. Fruits of the Spirit Manifest Through Trust

  4. Empowerment by the Holy Spirit

How the Two Are Related

Summary:

In essence, the continual act of surrender fosters a deeper relationship with the Holy Spirit, allowing His indwelling to grow in influence and presence, which transforms the believer and strengthens their trust in God.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Religion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2024 7:19:41 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Ping


2 posted on 12/21/2024 7:20:24 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Dude, you do know that it’s not actually an intelligence right?

You’re not actually talking to anything.

It’s just a computer program that synthesizes info from database along a pre-programmed method of analyzing the prompts to maximize the satisfaction from its results.

(Or something like that)


3 posted on 12/21/2024 7:24:40 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You do realize GPT answers questions by scanning webpages at very high speed and then presenting what it finds?

This is not intelligence and it’s not even opinion (other than those of the webpages read). It is doing what you could do yourself if you wanted to devote the time to it, which I suppose you do not.


4 posted on 12/21/2024 7:26:05 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Does it matter?;-)
5 posted on 12/21/2024 7:28:07 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Don't be daft. I use it every day in my work. I know what it is and what it isn't.

Do you use it?

6 posted on 12/21/2024 7:29:54 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Owen
What? You mean it isn't alive.:-)

You're so smart. I wish you had told me before.

7 posted on 12/21/2024 7:30:58 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Good point


8 posted on 12/21/2024 7:31:26 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hey...catch up. It’s called “machine learning”. Don’t be an idiot.


9 posted on 12/21/2024 7:34:02 AM PST by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The point is wasting bandwidth.

GPT is best used to answer questions like “what is the load factor on airlines today and should I always expect full flights”?

Or “how many stars are there within 5 light years of Earth”.

You do realize reddit has sub-reddits devoted to organizing participants to create webpage entries that are explicitly wrong, so that GPT will yield wrong answers?

You’re safe from their efforts asking for star counts or the ferry transit time from Juneau to Glacier Bay National Park. Religious questions? Prime targets.


10 posted on 12/21/2024 7:34:20 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
I finally found a way to live in the presence of the Lord
11 posted on 12/21/2024 7:34:32 AM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“You’re not actually talking to anything.”

Hey...I talk to the TV and radio a lot.

“Dude, you do know that it’s not actually an intelligence right?”

Ok, maybe that applies.


12 posted on 12/21/2024 7:39:12 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’d argue that greatly trivializes what it is doing. It’s simulating individual neurons in our brain and their weights and biases (synapses) between them and the neurotransmission between trillions of other simulated neurons.

The neural network is ‘trained’ with data sets from billions of sources. The result is something that has vast ‘knowledge’ and is unpredictable in how it will cross reference the information and respond to prompts. So it is a form of intelligence. Is it self aware? No. Is it simulating some brain functions? Yes. Is it an ‘if then else’ type program just referencing a database for responses? No.

While the ‘training’ can be biased by providing subjective materials that lean in one direction vs. another, there is no ‘pre-programmed’ response. It is highly unpredictable, even for the creators. It’s output can be ‘shaped’ by prior prompts and context - which makes it an insanely capable tool, especially for technical topics that are less subjective (like politics or religion).

I use it almost every day to assist in various technical tasks, especially those that require written information - processes, specifications, etc., even to challenge technical ideas. It will tell you how you may be wrong. Yes, everything requires human review and validation but it creates content and does analysis faster than any human.

...the technology is accelerating at a frightening pace, going beyond any individual understanding - this is the warning Elon has been arguing, but it is like the race to the A-Bomb....you don’t want to be 2nd - and similarly, nobody knows what the actual outcome will be.


13 posted on 12/21/2024 7:41:59 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Ping


14 posted on 12/21/2024 7:46:23 AM PST by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I didn’t see where the OP claimed it was ‘intelligent’. He/she just seems interested in how it responds and functions.


15 posted on 12/21/2024 7:46:55 AM PST by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owen

What is ‘wasting bandwidth’?

I thought we left that behind a long time ago...


16 posted on 12/21/2024 7:48:28 AM PST by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Owen
I ask you once again. Do you use it?

Perhaps you are afraid of wasting bandwidth.

17 posted on 12/21/2024 7:49:50 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

That is an interesting exchange. WHile it doesn’t have the capacity to understand what it has presented, I do find it interesting how it could pull all those data points together and create answers like that.
Since God is GOD, can he NOT use this instrument as a tool to inspire people to look more deeply into the word of God?


18 posted on 12/21/2024 7:59:26 AM PST by BigFreakinToad (All she is, is cackles in the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigFreakinToad
I do find it interesting how it could pull all those data points together and create answers like that.

Well said. That's where I come out.

Though I know it's just a large language model, I am still surprised at times that its responses seem insightful (despite the lack of any intelligence or insight).

19 posted on 12/21/2024 8:07:45 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Thank you.


20 posted on 12/21/2024 8:09:35 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson