Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gideon7

...No Radar system is 100%, they’ll be lucky to detect and target 40% of the incoming.


3 posted on 12/19/2024 6:09:46 PM PST by JJBookman (Democrats = Party of bad math )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JJBookman

“...No Radar system is 100%, they’ll be lucky to detect and target 40% of the incoming.”

And if one drone gets through, or an artillery shell...


6 posted on 12/19/2024 6:22:03 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JJBookman

It’s a DBF (digitial beam formed) high power microwave radar system, essentially. It bandies the words EMP about like it’s true EMP but is not.

True EMP requires an extremely wideband antenna (and therefore less directive), and in this case to target a single drone or sector of drones the DBF cannot be ‘wideband in the sense of an EMP’.

You generally can get 5-10% bandwidth on something like a phased array, maybe a little more with a DBF when using dipole like individual elements for the digital beam forming off the array elements.

So why the ‘EMP’ claim? What this system likely does is use high power DBF to directively hit a drone or drone sector with high power MW to either saturate the front ends of the drone receiver, or hopefully burn out drone receiver/control parts.


13 posted on 12/19/2024 11:46:39 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JJBookman

What if the drone comes at it at three feet off the ground?


15 posted on 12/20/2024 12:04:58 AM PST by Theophilus (covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson