Posted on 12/03/2024 4:22:13 AM PST by MtnClimber
When a new President comes into office, there is quite properly a changing of the guard. The people have voted for new policies. The norm is that all the Cabinet Secretaries, and all other Cabinet-level officials (like the heads of EPA, NSA and NASA, and the UN Ambassador) leave office, to be replaced by appointees of the new guy.
But there are exceptions. The two most notable are the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the Director of the FBI. (See also, the Commissioners of the so-called “independent” agencies, like the FTC, SEC, CFTC, etc., etc., a more complex situation that I will not cover in this post.). In the case of the Fed Chair and the FBI Director, they have fixed terms that are not in sync with the terms of Presidents; and the norm, if you want to call it that, has been that Presidents don’t fire them. The Fed Chair’s fixed term is only four years, expiring two years into a President’s term. Thus, although the Fed Chair does not normally leave office when a new President comes in, a President can always replace him or her a couple of years later.
And then there is the FBI Director. The FBI Director’s fixed term is 10 years. That implies an expectation that an FBI Director will serve through the terms of at least two, and potentially three, Presidents. The underlying idea — not unreasonable at first blush — is to avoid having the FBI in a position to be used as the political tool of the current President to go after political enemies.
But, as with everything else important in life, there are trade-offs. How about when the FBI arrogates to itself a mission to support one political party, here the Democrats, and persecute the other, here the Republicans?
The Constitution does not recognize such a thing as executive agencies “independent” from the President. Article II, Section 1 provides that “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” There is no grant of executive power to any other person, office or agency. Under the Constitution, the protection against abuse of power by a President, such as by using law enforcement to go after political adversaries, lies at the ballot box, not in having one or more law enforcement agencies answerable only to themselves and unaccountable to anyone.
Indeed the “independence” of the FBI has a history much more notable for abuse of power by the FBI itself than for any high-minded incorruptibility. J. Edgar Hoover was first appointed head of the then Bureau of Investigations in 1924 by President Calvin Coolidge, and subsequently became the first Director of the FBI when that agency was created under President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935. Hoover then served in that role all the way until his death in 1972, five Presidents later. According to a Wikipedia biography here, both Presidents Truman and Kennedy considered firing Hoover, but feared political blow-back. Hoover notoriously collected files of potentially compromising information on Presidents and other high-ranking politicians in order to protect his own power. In 1991 the New York Times conducted a review of President Nixon’s White House tapes, and found Nixon expressing the view that he could not fire Hoover because of fear of information that Hoover might release. (“Tape Shows Nixon Feared Hoover,” New York Times, June 5, 1991.)
But nothing can top the corruption of the FBI by the end of the Obama administration under Director James Comey. During the 2016 campaign, and then after Trump was elected that year, the FBI went all in to try to prevent Trump’s election, and then, after he was elected, to undermine his presidency. Readers will undoubtedly vividly remember the “Russia! Russia! Russia!” hysteria, substantially ginned up by the FBI, that gripped the country from about September/October 2016 all the way through 2018. As just one data point, consider this New York Times piece from March 20, 2017, reporting on Comey testimony to Congress at that time early in Trump’s first term, headline “F.B.I. Is Investigating Trump’s Russia Ties, Comey Confirms.” They were investigating the sitting President for what they had to know by that time was a hoax initially promulgated by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Meanwhile, Trump was foolishly following the “norm” of keeping the sitting FBI Director in place. And then, when he finally fired Comey in May 2017, the press was filled with articles insinuating that firing an FBI Director should be viewed as “obstruction of justice.” From the New York Times, May 11, 2017:
Some critics of President Trump have accused him of obstruction of justice in his firing of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, amid the bureau’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia. . . . Several federal statutes criminalize actions that impede official investigations.
And how about Christopher Wray? Yes, he was initially appointed by Trump. But under his leadership the FBI has continued its practices of being a partisan tool of the Democrats. To list just a few examples: (1) the SWAT raid on Roger Stone in January 2019 (conveniently leaked to CNN so that it could be filmed); (2) the raid by some 30 FBI agents on Mar-a-Lago in August 2022; and (3) the hundreds of investigations of J6 participants.
If Wray has not already resigned, Trump should fire him promptly on January 20. His right to do so is not a close constitutional question.
I think Wray should be fired. I think he should be stripped of US Citizenship and walked over the DMZ into N. Korea. But that is just me.
Manhattan Contrarian ping
Get rid of Powell too.
A one way ticket to Somalia works too..
Charge Wray immediately with evidence tampering and spoliation of the Pennsylvania crime scene, grooming and training of internal assassins
He’ll quit right before he’s fired......just like Jack Smith, they’re cowards that will not let DJT and especially the American people have the satisfaction.
The list is long, but it is not illustrious.
Everybody here is so nice. Fire him. Send him to another country. Blah blah blah.
EXECUTE HIM for the traitor that he is.
We have to play the lefts dirty game of blackmail to get rid of these jerks.
They probably need to slice four or five management levels down too.
I strongly disagree on him getting rid of Powell. But I do think that Wray should go.
Everything that Powell has ever done has been telegraphed ahead of time. And what he has done has all been based on his opinions on what he thinks would be best for the economy. I am not saying that he was correct. But I am saying that he has been above board.
The Bond Market, which could become Trump’s #1 unbeatable and souless enemy, may not handle the firing of Powell very well. We must not forget that the 36.1 trillion debt has now made them the master of America as our freedom has been abolished through over 3.6 quadrillion baby steps one penny at a time.
Instead of firing Powell he should just tell the American people the truth on what Congress has done in the past and use this as a reason for why the fiscal ship must be saved through abolishing many federal agencies and cutting back on federal workforce sizes.
Firing Powell will unsettle the markets. And I think the law may be on Powell’s side for this anyway.
Fire Powell for incompetence.
Fire, arrest, tortured and then placed in front of a military firing squad. These filthy scumbag FBI criminals need to receive the death penalty. Show NO mercy. Trump must finish it.
Flush twice
“If Wray has not already resigned, Trump should fire him promptly on January 20.”
Absolutely. And have him unceremoniously marched out of the building.
Many people talk about “term limits” on our elected officials - but what about “term limits” on unelected bureaucrats or programs?
People like Fauci, Comey, Walensky are career bureaucrats, who amassed so much power they were able to shut down American and conduct a coup against an elected President.
When were they ever elected?
Trump I hope has learned by now that it was a mistake to replace Comey with Wray, he needed to bring someone new in from the outside back in 2017.
You are far too kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.