Before you get to reasonable doubt about cell phone location data, you have to have evidence of a crime.
The Epstein intel operation was quite sophisticated, and a lot of Epstein guests were famous or wealthy (or both) people used as social proof to lure the targets.
Being in the company of Jeffrey Epstein, on Little St. James or elsewhere, is not a crime.
Whoever seized his tapes and CDs has evidence of multiple crimes and knows the identity of the "perps", it is both unnecessary and stupid to follow cell phone location data which cannot identify people who committed crimes.
That information can absolutely used.
The person in question does not have to see a video of themselves. They already know they were there.
So, all you have to do is IMPLY that you do have a video of them doing something with a child. Then see IF they react or not. Then you will know IF they are indeed guilty of something.
Dershowitz fought the charge of the woman who SAID he was there. Which he was. But he said he went with his wife.
He fought the accusation and it cost him a million in attorney fees. Then they came to an agreement to make her go away. It was her word against his. She had no proof.
Other people are guilty and they know it. Those are the people that can be influenced by fear of being exposed and ruined financially.