That information can absolutely used.
The person in question does not have to see a video of themselves. They already know they were there.
So, all you have to do is IMPLY that you do have a video of them doing something with a child. Then see IF they react or not. Then you will know IF they are indeed guilty of something.
Dershowitz fought the charge of the woman who SAID he was there. Which he was. But he said he went with his wife.
He fought the accusation and it cost him a million in attorney fees. Then they came to an agreement to make her go away. It was her word against his. She had no proof.
Other people are guilty and they know it. Those are the people that can be influenced by fear of being exposed and ruined financially.
Was his wife’s phone there? Was there any activity on her credit cards back home? Uh, huh, so who was she doing what to on the island?