What I don’t understand is how a number of senate seats were stolen in states which Trump won.
I can understand these liberals wanting to steal Senate seats.
What I don’t understand is why they would steal the election for a Democrat Senate candidate, but not steal the state for Kamala as well.
So we have to believe that liberals stole Senate seats but allowed Trump to win the election.
There are several factors here.
1. Harris was a weak candidate—even in demographics which are traditionally Democrat. She was a terrible speaker and a blatant affirmative action pick.
2. Democrat Senate candidates were stronger—even without cheating. That was reflected in polls showing Senate candidates running two to four percentage points behind President Trump in the swing states.
3. That said—the late night Milwaukee 90-10 vote dump clearly stole that Senate seat.
4. Arizona and Nevada Senate seats were almost certainly stolen.
5. Michigan was probably stolen as well.
AOC posted a similar question on her social media. Why did so many people in her district vote for both her and Trump.
Many answered that they found her and Trump to be real and Kamala to be fake.
Trump's poor coattails in many of these down-ballot races can be explained by one simple fact. Many Democrats voted for Trump at the top and then (D) down the rest of the ballot.
Maybe they were Biden liberals displeased about how he was shafted by the DNC.
My theory is that the Dem Party leadership [which DOESN'T include Pedo Joe and KamaLOL!] knows that something bad is coming down the pike as we go into the next four years, and they wanted to stick Trump and the Republicans with the flaming bag of dog cr@p.
It would be even sweeter for them if they could use garbage humans like Murkie and Susie, and other RINOs like them, to hobble Trump and MAGA. So, reduce the majority that was inevitable to a seat or two.
Also, marking up a ballot costs money and time. On a split ticket, creating a ballot is harder. freeper LS pointed out that the switch to KamaLOL! reduced the amount of time for "ballot" creation.
It's actually a strategy that I would have used, myself.
Have the Senate and the House on a knife's edge in the other side's favor, so I could blame the Pubbies for stuff that I would be working to make "go wrong".
Maybe Mrs. Emhoff is unlikeable.
Trump win was too big to rig, I have no doubt they tried, because if all these groups like Blacks, Amish, Hispanics, Young Men, Unions members, etc turned to Trump in high numbers, then how the hell did he only eeek out a win by only 1-2% in these states, makes no sense, he should won by 4-5% at least.
Plus it was over several states, so what's the point of rigging a Trump win in say Nevada if he was going to win Pennsylvania & the Presidency anyhow, you would just draw unnecessary attention to yourself.