Does anyone actually believe that Trump won Arizona by 5.5% but Kari Lake lost?

X ^ | Nov 26, 2024 | DC_Draino

[george76]

Does anyone actually believe that Trump won Arizona by 5.5% but Kari Lake lost?

You think Trump voters really went in there and voted for the open border cartel guy?

Arizona’s elections are an absolute joke

...

Arizona FINALLY finished counting votes yesterday, a mere 20 days after Election Day. Trump won AZ by 5.5% making it the reddest of the seven swing states. President Trump won Maricopa County, the biggest prize in the state, by over 3%.

This puts Arizona in the same category as Minnesota (Kamala by +4), Virginia (Kamala +5), New Mexico (Kamala +6), and New Jersey (Kamala +6).

...

They cheated as usual.. -Catturd.

...

For the second time in two years, Kari Lake won.

...

Arizona is the epitome of election fraud.

[DiogenesLamp]

I'm pretty sure you are getting all your election data from the same people who we think are stealing elections.

Katie Hobbs ran the election system in 2022, and now some other Democrat lowlife is running it.

Everything they put out is suspect and should not be accepted at face value.

[DiogenesLamp]

To elect Republican Senators from AZ, NV, WI, and MI, you need better candidates.

Better vote counters. They tried to steal Pennsylvania, and they *DID* steal Wisconsin.

All the elections in the swing states smell.

[DiogenesLamp]

Yep. I think the strategy was to fix senate races so they could block Trump. There would be too much attention if the vote dumps elected Kamala this time.

Nobody would have believed it. That would have been a bridge too far.

[Dixie Mom]

That’s because the usual subject collectivists jump on this and similar threads deploying the “Diamond Tactic.” Freepers aren’t so easily brainwashed. I love you guys. :)

[Political Junkie Too]

I'm pretty sure you are getting all your election data from the same people who we think are stealing elections.

You're "sure" of where I'm getting my data, but you "think" people are stealing the election? Let me know when you're sure they stole the election and where you think I got my data.

Anyway, I don't agree. The numbers are too consistent. Unless you're accusing the state of changing votes, they didn't insert fake votes or it would have shown up in over-votes elsewhere.

Trump beat Harris by 71,515 votes in Maricopa, but Gallego beat Lake by 105,301 votes. There were only 23,862 people who voted for President by skipped the Senate race, yet 111,066 people voted for Trump by not Lake.

I think the data shows that Republicans sat out the Lake race and Independents broke for Gallego.

-PJ

[TornadoAlley3]

Do you propose any solutions?

Do you live in Arizona?

[DiogenesLamp]

Let me know when you're sure they stole the election and where you think I got my data.

I'm already sure they stole the election, and if you didn't get your data from the Arizona vote counters/stealers, where else could you have gotten it from?

I think the data shows that Republicans sat out the Lake race and Independents broke for Gallego.

Fraud vitiates everything. Since not nearly enough was done to deal with the fraud in 2020 or 2022, I find it quite plausible that the fraud system was still working in 2024.

In Maricopa county Arizona, there were 75,000 fake votes in 2020, and 200,000 fake voters in 2020 in all of Arizona.

I don't think they suddenly stopped frauding things, I think they just made it look plausible.

They count the votes you know, and were it not for the cyberninja audit in 2021, we would not have known just how corrupt elections were in Arizona.

[DiogenesLamp]

Do you propose any solutions?

Fix the fraud problems. Go back and punish people for the vote fraud that was uncovered in the 2020 and 2022 elections. With Trump now at the helm of the Federal government, I expect to see 2020 vote fraud investigated and prosecuted. I expect that corrupt Arizona judge that threw out the election fraud cases to also be investigated and prosecuted. I'm pretty sure he is a Mexican drug cartel stooge.

Do you live in Arizona?

No, but corruption there affects me too. It is in the interests of all states and all citizens to prevent election fraud from installing a corrupt government.

I will add, I worked very hard straightening out my states a couple of decades ago, and it has been mostly on the right path ever since. Were I in Arizona, I would have been causing them holy hell over the vote fraud they already perpetrated.

[Political Junkie Too]

Then why did they let Trump win?

Wouldn't they have been motivated at least to deny him the symbolic total running the table of the swing states?

-PJ

[DiogenesLamp]

Then why did they let Trump win?

I think Harmeet Dhillon had a lot to do with that. Also the additional scrutiny placed on them for the Trump election likely made it harder.

I noticed their efforts to put 200,000 illegals on the voting rolls didn't go unnoticed. They got a judge to order those names be made public.

I wonder if any of them voted?

But your view could be correct. I just have no trust for those people after what they did in 2020 and 2022.

Rigging the previous elections against Kari Lake also served to hurt her in future elections because it appended the tag of "loser" on to her.

People hate losers and especially whiny losers, and the media-liars and government officials of Arizona did everything they could to portray her that way.

And of course the corrupt McCain wing of the party in Arizona attempted to bribe her. Do you remember that?

Wouldn't they have been motivated at least to deny him the symbolic total running the table of the swing states?

Motivated, but couldn't pull it off. Decided the risk was not worth it, and also, Trump threw monkey wrenches into their works to defraud him. I have little doubt that without all the efforts in place to prevent fraud in Arizona, they would have once again handed the state to the Democrat.

[Political Junkie Too]

But your view could be correct.

The reason I don't buy into the cheat is that the final Atlas Intel poll covering the two days before the election is matching exactly what happened in Maricopa and Pima counties. The poll is based on contacting actual voters.

Atlas Intel called the race for Lake 48.4% - 47.8%, with a margin of error of 3%. Gallego won 50.1% - 47.7%, a difference of 2.4% and within the MOE.

Furthermore, the Atlas Intel cross-tabs showed:

1. Urban voters (like Maricopa and Pima) supported Gallego 58.6% to 38.8%.
   • Lake would win the less populated suburban areas 52.8% to 44.7%, and the rural areas 60.3% to 30.6%.

2. Independent voters supported Gallego 49.8% to 42.1%.

Lake couldn't make up the Gallego lead from Phoenix (Maricopa 105,301) and Tucson (Pima 105,730) in the suburban and rural counties.

She led Gallego in these counties:

1. Cochise: +9,837 out of 31,859 votes cast
2. Gila: +8,103 out of 27,327
3. Graham: +6,150 out of 14,993
4. Greenlee: +976 out of 3,283
5. La Paz: +2,706 out of 7,509
6. Mohave: +52,916 out of 108,470
7. Navaho: +5,045 out of 50,469
8. Pinal: +28,921 out of 206,891
9. Yavapai: +41,123 out of 147,832
10. Yuma: +7,013 out of 67,102

Atlas Intel also called the race for Trump 51.0% to 45.9% (+5.1%). The actual result was Trump 52.2% to 46.7% (+5.5%). They wouldn't hit a bulls-eye in the Presidential race and miss the Senate race using the same sample population.

That's why I support the "no cheat" in Arizona, because it fits the Atlas Intel poll perfectly, and they were the most accurate pollsters in several elections (both domestically and internationally).

-PJ

[Pearfect]

MORE DEMOCRAT FRAUD.

[napscoordinator]

That is cute. I must borrow it.