To: Kudsman
It was in the 80s that D.C. forced this change on the entire country. Lose your federal $$$ if a state didn’t do this right on red stuff
To: George from New England
It was in the 80s that D.C. forced this change on the entire country. Lose your federal $$$ if a state didn’t do this right on red stuff "This change" means force the entire country to have right-on-red, or prevent the entire country from turning right-on-red?
To my experience, preventing right-on-red would cause many backups while acknowledging there are exceptions.
22 posted on
11/25/2024 8:01:22 AM PST by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: George from New England
Durham or Raleigh have passed a no right turn on red law. Too many accidents. Between poorly trained millennial's, Gen-X, etc and foreign drivers none of which understand the concept of “right-of-way” there has been an increase in accidents. Illegals driving will probably make it worse. I was turning right on a green light, a young woman made a U-turn laid on her horn and screaming at me because she wanted the lane I was in and she almost T-boned me. Big sign in front of her said u-turn must yield.
38 posted on
11/25/2024 11:58:13 AM PST by
OldGoatCPO
(No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for me. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson