OK for Russia to hit civilian targets inside Ukraine but not ok for Ukraine to hit military targets inside Russia? Explain to me how that works again please.
Russia uses its own stuff, doesn’t beg the West for gibs.
This isn’t some debate about fairness. This is a question of what it will cost us in terms of the Russian counter move. As we refrained from allowing Uke access to our guidance systems for long range missiles the Ruskies have refrained from arming Houthis and Iranians. I imagine that will no longer be the case.
“OK for Russia to hit civilian targets inside Ukraine but not ok for Ukraine to hit military targets inside Russia? Explain to me how that works again please.”
It’s not Ukes doing it. It is us and the Brits.
If Russia or China gave advanced weapons and provided operators to shoot them -into- the USA from Cuba or Venezuela, we would regard that as an attack by Russia or China on the USA.
The nazis have fired numerous drones and rockets into Russia. But they correctly argue that if Ukes are using precision weapons that they cannot use without us, that is NATO, shooting into Russia... with all that implies.
“OK for Russia to hit civilian targets inside Ukraine but not ok for Ukraine to hit military targets inside Russia? “
No one here is saying that. We are not okay with using American weapons to do it. We recognize and support the Ukraine’s right to defend themselves. We don’t support their efforts to widen the war and involve the USA in it. That’s a huge difference.
It is okay for Ukraine to hit Russia as long as they aren’t using NATO supplied and operated weapons.
Surprised you don’t get that.
How many Ukraine satellites are used in targeting?