đź’Ż
The radical democrat party in charge now saw it as an opportunity to smear Trump. They probably realized it was so long their mostly stupid and brainwashed (I mean that) majority would not check up by reading it.
Not my idea but someone made a very good point. Project 2025 made a cardinal sin. They didn’t create a “handbook” or “easy reader” version for the masses to use.
BTW
Im getting close to page 600 or 2/3 through.
That was one of my biggest (internal) criticisms as I read it...that there was little in the form of a consistent framework in which ideas were presented. There were obviously a few guidelines that had been set out by the Heritage Foundation, but I didn’t find they were followed uniformly or in a useful way.
That really put the kibosh on a summary that didn’t make it an entirely new project past reading it.
Someone did make the excellent suggestion that I might feed it into ChatGPT to summarize (Not explain-the would be a disaster IMO, since I don’t trust AI to do that reliably yet) but I never got around to it.
By the way-just to be clear-do you impression of it to mine (NOT evil, unless you are a Leftist)?