That was one of my biggest (internal) criticisms as I read it...that there was little in the form of a consistent framework in which ideas were presented. There were obviously a few guidelines that had been set out by the Heritage Foundation, but I didn’t find they were followed uniformly or in a useful way.
That really put the kibosh on a summary that didn’t make it an entirely new project past reading it.
Someone did make the excellent suggestion that I might feed it into ChatGPT to summarize (Not explain-the would be a disaster IMO, since I don’t trust AI to do that reliably yet) but I never got around to it.
By the way-just to be clear-do you impression of it to mine (NOT evil, unless you are a Leftist)?
Ohh I agree completely. It’s not evil at all, unless you are a leftist.
For example I’d say the one guiding theme of 2025, so far, is to reduce the sheer SIZE of government.
I could not tell you how many dozens of times they have suggesting eliminating or reducing and merging this or that department or sub department with another. Dept of Ed is the most prominent example.
The evil democrats in power now want an all reaching, all powerful and large Nanny State that tells us what to do from cradle to grave. ‘It takes a Village’ you know…as one Harridan said.