Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

Some endorsements don’t have much behind them. They are just fluff. Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is a good example of that.

But the Cheneys endorsement of Harris is quite significant. Because it’s an endorsement for more disastrous foreign adventures, and for more war.

Tulsi Gabbard gets that. Let’s hope the voters get it, too.


2 posted on 11/03/2024 7:59:01 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

“But the Cheneys endorsement of Harris is quite significant. Because it’s an endorsement for more disastrous foreign adventures, and for more war.”

And the fact that the Left is so excited about the Cheneys’ endorsement means the Left has now become the Neocon block.


7 posted on 11/03/2024 8:07:01 AM PST by vladimir998 ( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
In hindsight, how did I ever miss it? Dick Cheney was in fact a war-mongering p$$ycho, and George Bush Jr. was just along for the ride, just as depicted in that liberal movie that I thought was just parody at the time.

No, it was truth.

8 posted on 11/03/2024 8:31:05 AM PST by OKSooner (First they came for peanut... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson