To: RandFan
Some endorsements don’t have much behind them. They are just fluff. Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris is a good example of that.
But the Cheneys endorsement of Harris is quite significant. Because it’s an endorsement for more disastrous foreign adventures, and for more war.
Tulsi Gabbard gets that. Let’s hope the voters get it, too.
2 posted on
11/03/2024 7:59:01 AM PST by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Leaning Right
“But the Cheneys endorsement of Harris is quite significant. Because it’s an endorsement for more disastrous foreign adventures, and for more war.”
And the fact that the Left is so excited about the Cheneys’ endorsement means the Left has now become the Neocon block.
7 posted on
11/03/2024 8:07:01 AM PST by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: Leaning Right
In hindsight, how did I ever miss it? Dick Cheney was in fact a war-mongering p$$ycho, and George Bush Jr. was just along for the ride, just as depicted in that liberal movie that I thought was just parody at the time.
No, it was truth.
8 posted on
11/03/2024 8:31:05 AM PST by
OKSooner
(First they came for peanut... )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson