[No name given]

I’m with Coach Tony Dungy on this one.

[Equine1952]

I’ve watched Dungy for years over his career, from what I’ve seen, I believe he’s a very good man. He’s right about this too in my opinion. Great work Tony. 👍

[PGR88]

Tony Dungy has always been a class act. I’ve followed his work and life for 2 decades and there doesn’t seem to be a single false thing about him.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Sickens me that most likely this will pass

[SaveFerris]

Just reminding any lurkers about Democrat Kamala Harris - Please DO NOT vote this Godless Woman into the highest office in the land - America's future is at stake



Democrat Kamala Harris FREAKED OUT when somebody said "JESUS IS LORD!" - the two Christians said they were hurried out, cursed at, mocked. They were in the lion's den with Kamala Harris and followers at their Satanic Abortion Rally. Dangerous ground with Reprobate goats. I'm glad that they got out unharmed.





Do NO harm Christians but pray, pray, pray!!!

[Strict9]

The Advertisements for this here say-“Stop the cruel abortion amendment,” or something to that effect. They always say it’s “cruel.” Not letting me kill some kid is ,”cruel.” Just let me slaughter innocent children you heartless bastard.

[Robert DeLong]

Just to refresh people:

Florida Amendment 4, the Right to Abortion Initiative, is on the ballot in Florida as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.

A "yes" vote supports adding the following language to the Florida Constitution’s Declaration of Rights: “… no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.” Amendment 4 would maintain the current constitutional provision that permits a law requiring parents to be notified before a minor can receive an abortion.

A "no" vote opposes amending the Florida Constitution's Declaration of Rights to provide that the state cannot "... prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider."

So he opposes adding language to the law that requires parental notification. I think that is a slippery slope that takes a decision out of the parents hands.

I have to disagree with him, unless he would agree to a waiver in cases where the patient is in imminent danger if the situation is not dealt with ASAP.

I still think the parent must be the decision maker for the child. Perhaps there could be an age limit applied also. Say 16?