So, you want proof of the proof.
Bingo. Show me the proof of the proof if it’s been proven!
there should be proof of the proof that there’s proof otherwise proving there is proof will only prove to be a problem for those who’s proof is provable but not probable beyond the proof required to prove it’s provable. I could be proved wrong if it were possible to prove that the proof is provable beyond the proof needed to prove the proof is provable...but I’m waiting for a more provable proof that proves the proof is provable. but that’s just me.