[hardspunned]

My God, they’re clowning around like this in someone’s suburban backyard!!

I believe these two morons reside in Missouri and Illinois. There are red flag laws in both states that should be used to get dangerous weapons out of the hands of these idiots.

[PubliusMM]

Sorry...that whole table scene looks staged, IMO.
No place to lay down a weapon, and that bolt gun should be slipping, butt to the left, the way it’s positioned.
No wonder these clowns injured someone.
Some folks should just leave live fire weapons alone.

[Kudsman]

So the “man” at the range in the pink dress shirt is the one that got winged by slag? Smh

[caver]

Not only is there one stupid person there are ten of them!

[Dahoser]

The condescension from is always there. Always. Now, though, with President Trump leading Harris, it’s become epic.

The left sees most men as either cucks in red and plaid pajamas or dumb brutes who shoot things, work on cars, and drive trucks. Either way, the left’s election strategy with these men consists of ads showing men in red and plaid pajamas or men shooting things, working on cars, and driving trucks saying they support Democrats because the cucks will always do what they’re told and the dumb brutes will see the dumb brutes like them in the ads and follow what they do.

We’ve had Elmer Walz hunting wabbits and not being able to load his shotgun, the kaleidoscope of manly men eating carburetors and sitting on their trucks, and now this putz Kinsinger and his fellow clowns shooting things like idiots and winging at least one person with shrapnel (but it’s okay because they had four first aid kits).

Three instances of condescension poorly masquerading as political ads.

[DeplorablePaul]

Looks like the set of Alec Baldwins movie Rust.

[blitz128]

The scope on his rifle makes me chuckle.

I served with Adam in Iraq, thiught he was a good guy, boy was I wrong

[maddog55]

It’s not a public shooting range and not a sanctioned range of any kind at all. Probably someone’s backyard at best.

You can be stupid on private property and there’s tons of videos to prove that especially tannerite videos.

[CFW]

[Pollard]

Pretty short range for rifles

[circlecity]

I have heard several say he was holding the foregrip wrong. I have never used or had a foregrip on my ARs. Never needed one. How is he holding it wrong?

[Redplum]

I find this Kunce character intriguing...

I wonder who is bankrolling him. His ads started showing up in the St Louis Market around mid-summer and have been running non-stop since then. Nobody had ever heard of him before that.

He’s portraying himself as a USMC veteran (always calls himself LtCol Kunce), pro-gun, pro-abortion. In his latest ads he’s comparing himself to MO’s former Senator Kit Bond (another RINO from hell, good riddance) who brought “millions of tax dollars to Missouri” while Hawley has delivered nothing. Gag.

Anyway, he’s easily out-spent Hawley 10 to 1 in the last 3 months - so, I wonder, who exactly is bankrolling this clown??

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

QUIT posting this stuff!

Do NOT interrupt your enemy when (s)he is making a mistake!

~ Sun Tzu

[PIF]

Entire post:

Sean Davis@seanmdav
I’m sorry, but this tweet is INSANE. It contains multitudes. The longer you look at the photos, the worse it gets.

1) They are shooting steel at 5-7 yards with rifles, which could’ve killed somebody given the force with which the bullets will ricochet off the steel targets at the at distance. You would instantly get permanently banned at my range if you did that. Zero questions asked.

2) Kinzinger holds his rifle like a complete ninny, and that will never not be funny to me. And pro-tip for @AdamKinzinger: the eye protection works better when it’s on your eyes, not your head. You stupid idiot. Try using your brain for once. You’re lucky you still have one after today.

3) Kinzinger is for some reason using a high-powered scope (at least a 3-9x by the looks of it) to shoot a target 5 yards away.

4) There is a bolt action rifle on the table, so presumably someone was also using that to shoot steel at 5 yards. Insane.

5) There are at least two canisters of explosive Tannerite powder on the table, down range from where guns are being fired. That could’ve potentially killed or seriously injured someone if someone shot it or if someone was stupid enough to be shooting close enough to steel for a ricochet to hit it.

6) At one point the cameraman is down range from all the guns, which - given the violations we’ve found so far - we can assume are not safe and unloaded. Way to think that one through, dummy.

7) And these morons are so stupid that EVEN AFTER SHOOTING SOMEONE (whose injury was due entirely to negligence), they thought it would be an awesome idea to post the evidence of their idiocy for all the world to see. Lawyer up, dummies, because that reporter you could’ve killed has you dead to rights.

Absolutely mind-blowing insanity from a candidate for a political party that wants to take away your guns because it claims you can’t safely own them.





Lucas Kunce@LucasKunceMO
Great day at the range today with my friend @AdamKinzinger. We got to hang out with some union workers while exercising our freedom. Always have your first aid kit handy. Shrapnel can always fly when you hit a target like today, and you’ve got to be ready to go. We had four first aid kits, so we were able to take care of the situation, and I’m glad Ryan is okay and was able to continue reporting.

[eyeamok]

Sure looks and sounds likje:
Reckless Endangerment using a Firearm causing Injury or Death
and it carries a 20 year sentence.

[joe fonebone]

“Shall not be infringed”

[suasponte137]

This whole thing reminds me of Chuck Schumer having raw hamburgers with cheese already on them, on his gril....that wasn’t turned on.

People who understand firearms, ranges, etc...will see the absolute idiocy of this photo op.

Those that don’t...might be impressed.

[Flag_This]

"They are shooting steel at 5-7 yards with rifles, which could’ve killed somebody given the force with which the bullets will ricochet off the steel targets at the at distance."

Way back in the day, when I was in the Army, I was at a live fire range and had been detailed to watch for any aircraft that might accidentally overfly our range (at least, I think that's what I was supposed to be doing). We were shooting M-16s that day and the targets were out at least 100 meters.

I was positioned well behind the firing line and to the extreme left of the range. I distinctly heard a ricochet fly past me at one point. I don't think it was particularly close to me, but the point is, that bullet had to have traveled at least 100 meters out and ricocheted 100 meters back for me to hear it. And we were shooting at plastic/vinyl (whatever) silhouettes backed by earthen berms, not steel targets 25' away.

[Dead Corpse]

Shooting even a .22LR at that short of a distance is going to spall like crazy.

Eye protection. It is not a suggestion. It’s a rule.

Height over bore is a thing with scopes.

[NorthMountain]

They are shooting steel at 5-7 yards with rifles, which could’ve killed somebody given the force with which the bullets will ricochet off the steel targets at the at distance

BS. The bullets won't "riccochet" off the steel plate. They splatter. The lead gets turned to dust and the jacket to small sharp pieces that can inflict a very minor cut. And it tears up the steel ...

[Organic Panic]

This sounds like a set up. The description from the original poster sounds soooo much like a setup a gun hating democrat would make up trying to write as a gun enthusiast.

The reply is spot on. The more you look at it, the more ridiculous it looks.