I'm sure our 'betters' envisioned this type of townhouse situation while writing the article:
WTH WROTE THIS??? The LEFT wants us all in SMALL PLACES in URBAN AREAS in order TO CONTROL US!
The First Law of Political Thermodynamics -
When you spread the wealth you have to shrink the dream
Our overlords have spoken
It’s Orwell’s Animal Farm. Toil, taxpayer, and lower your expectations. The dreams of your “leaders” and their chosen pets come first.
“it’s time to readjust the scope”
You first Jeffie.
Don’t see Bezos downsizing.
So the commie RATS think Americans need to share OUR American Dream built by our parents, grandparents and great grandparents with the freeloading azhos of the world who are too lazy to build their own dream in their own country. The bass turds are looking to the “racist” and “evil” Americans to provide them with a “better life.” They don’t deserve it, and Americans shouldn’t bend over and give it to them.
“but the Washington Post says young Americans should resign themselves to small houses in a nation packed with millions of government-imported renters and buyers.“
So get used to the Bourgeoisie living high on the hog and the Proletariat eating their table scraps.
The fact is that our biggest cities are simply too large for the single family house, which on a large scale translates into long commutes, to be the norm.
We invented the automobile suburb and massive suburban sprawl after WWII. Prior to that, people were packed quite densely into the urban core. Suburban sprawl expanded the space available, but 60 or more years later, many cities have filled that space. The biggest cities are terminally congested, and even where congestion is less extreme, commutes are longer.
To preserve single family houses as the middle class norm, we have to accept limits to growth in the current urban cores and shift new development to smaller cities. This can include edge cities in existing major metro areas, but IMHO, the best potential lies in smaller cities and towns, nowhere near the metro area. There is no magic number, but a city of 250-500,000 seems plenty big to me.
I live in DC. The affordable housing lobby is in a permanent hysteria about our “housing crisis,” by which they mean that gentrification is rapidly squeezing the bad neighborhoods out of existence (a good thing) while younger people, who apparently think that bars, restaurants, movie theaters, etc. don’t exist in the suburbs, don’t want long commutes and think they are entitled to live centrally. This translates into a demand to upzone everything, eliminate the building height restrictions, and sacrifice our tree-lined streets and quiet, walkable neighborhoods in favor of turning DC into Manhattan on the Potomac.
I use this as an opportunity to suggest to young people that maybe we should control our borders, as opposed to doubling the U.S. population every 50 years. But more immediately, DC is big enough now. With modern communications, there is no reason to site any major new developments inside the beltway. And if I were planning something, I’d go a lot further out than that.
Or...people could boot the current “leadership” and find others who are actually competent and don’t despise their own country.
Check the Tax Assessor records in DC and Maryland.
All those Washington Post editorialists live in million dollar plus single family homes or in million dollar condos.
Exactly.
the national socialist fascist media ALWAYS promotes acceptance of lowered standards of living after Democrats have been in power for few years ... ALWAYS ...
bump