Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Trump takes Penn & NY.
1 posted on 10/19/2024 2:15:23 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather
That has helped secure thousands of blue Democratic votes in an increasingly red northeastern Pennsylvania.

The cross-border ballot fraud "helper dudes & dudettes" from New Jersey didn't hurt the Democrat numbers in northeastern Pennsylvania, either...

2 posted on 10/19/2024 2:21:14 AM PDT by kiryandil (Kraft durch Freude! - The Kamunist and The Walzrus )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I’ve spent several days in NE PA—Scranton and neighboring Wilkes-Barre.

I’d be very distressed if the rest of the US appeared as rundown, noisy, and hopelessly ramshackled.


3 posted on 10/19/2024 2:49:12 AM PDT by Does so (Vote for The Anti-War President...🇺🇦...Dem☭crats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I’m not so sure he takes N.Y. N.Y. State has a lot of republicans, but the majority of voters are in N.Y. City, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo, etc. The cities control the vote as in other blue states, it won’t be easy for Trump, but not beyond him.


4 posted on 10/19/2024 2:59:34 AM PDT by Omnivore-Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"It’s even worse in rural Pennsylvania, where Walz and “second gentleman” Doug Emhoff tried a “Real Men for Kamala tour,” complete with ads and Zoom calls about why men should support her."

I didn't catch that. Did he borrow the obama campaign bus to get around?


6 posted on 10/19/2024 3:19:06 AM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I wish you were right but he’s not taking NY. The state is probably more blue than CA at this point and the rural upstate counties that vote GOP are too sparsely populated to offset the huge D ( often far left D) enrollment advantage around NYC


7 posted on 10/19/2024 4:28:05 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Shapiro will do nothing to help her in Pennsylvania and Gestapo Gretchen will do nothing to help her in Michigan. Those are the two front runners for the 2028 Democrat nomination for president. If Heels Up Harris wins, they can each forget about running until 2032 at the earliest. They’re obviously not going to unseat an incumbent president.

On top of that, Shapiro was dumped at the last minute because he’s a Jew....and he and everybody else knows it. That had to have pissed him off mightily - thus giving him another reason to not lift a finger to help Heels Up in Pennsylvania. Without the Democrat election fraud machine working overtime, there’s no way Harris wins either state.


10 posted on 10/19/2024 6:02:06 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Presupposes a fair election.


11 posted on 10/19/2024 6:57:43 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Zelden came within just over 6% of wining the governorship of NY in ‘22. Trump may come even closer than that to Kamala. Why? Trump is likely to take over 30% of the NYC vote. He has been campaigning in the city and will soon appear at Madison Square Garden.

Lots of brothers/sisters and Latino supporters will be there. If you think inflation and trouble with illegal aliens are bad in your community, they are much worse in NYC and other large democrat-run cities. Watch as Trump carries the battleground states and wins the so-called “popular vote” (which is a leftist media notion and which is not mentioned in the US Constitution).

Remember, liberal pundits, even just a week before Ronald Reagan easily defeated the hapless Jimmy Carter, were claiming Carter was likely to win, or at worst that the race was “too close to call.” I’m not saying Trump’s landslide will be as resounding as Reagan’s ‘80 and ‘84 landslides, but you are likely going to see Trump carrying states that no pundits from either side saw him taking. Ronald Reagan carried Massachusetts twice, and he took New York in ‘84. Nobody saw that coming. In ‘84 Reagan carried 49 states. He lost only Minnesota, a state with about 2,100,000 voters by a little over 4,000 votes. Trump is surging. Don’t underestimate him.

It is indeed going to be “too big to rig.”


12 posted on 10/19/2024 7:16:09 AM PDT by Combat_Liberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson