Well at least the Dodgers won't have to worry about going to Philadelphia.
Buehler?.........................
Sucka.
It better be accurate to the second.
Anyone who wears a $100,000 watch in public, in LOS ANGELES (or near LA, in this case), deserves to have it ‘repossessed’. The OBVIOUS thing to do is get a knock-off when in a big crowd of strangers and leave the expensive one at home...hmmm...come to think of it, that won’t work in California either, maybe bury it in the desert?
Nothing excuses thievery, and to each his own, but...personally, I think walking around with $100k on your wrist is kind of disgusting.
That’s why I like my $25 watch.
He makes eight million dollars a year. He probably does not look at money the way you and I do, considering how much he makes.
$100,000 seems like a lot to pay for a watch but to him. Maybe that amount is pocket change. Maybe it was an impulse purchase.
Well at least the Dodgers won't have to worry about going to Philadelphia.
I can’t muster much sympathy for anyone who wears a $100,000 piece of jewelry in a crowded place.
I haven’t worn a watch in 30 years. No need with digital clocks everywhere.
Woops! Do we have another ballplayer gambling? In memory of Pete, the world has changed. But of course, Ohtani wasn’t gambling.