Judge Unseals New Evidence in Federal Election Case Against Trump

The New York Times ^ | Oct. 2, 2024 Updated 4:32 p.m. ET | Alan Feuer, Charlie Savage

[E. Pluribus Unum]

"He said, she said" is not evidence of anything.

[SamAdams76]

This is the best indicator yet that Trump is ahead in all the internal polling.

[cuban leaf]

Well, technically it is evidence. It’s just not compelling. The testimony of the prostitute in the Duke Lacrosse team case was “evidence”, but worthless and untrustworthy. Hence the final outcome.

[Ann Archy]

Just PROVES that Vance DESTROYED WALZ last night!!!

[cuban leaf]

They are ramping up their scorched earth mode. We ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Grab yer popcorn! this is gonna be one for the history books.

Actually, it already is.

[Ms. AntiFeminazi]

That’s it?! He should be laughed out of court.

[CaptainK]

I doubt there is anything in the filing that we haven’t already heard. Just a new spin on old news.

[HamiltonJay]

Here we go again...

Just like he “lunged at the steering wheel”...

[Mark]

ANOTHER million votes for Trump.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Gee, right after Vance kicked Tampon Tims ass. What a coincidence.

And I just want to thank all the Republican AGs out there for helping out and indicting every last scumbag involved in the Russia collusion hoax. Trump merely questions an election which he has every right to do, and he gets indicted. Hillary and her crew lay a big fat one on the entire country costing millions in taxes, bankrupting innocent people, hindering a sitting POTUS from doing his job for 3 years, harming foreign relations, and not one of them gets even a parking ticket

[No name given]

This only shows how desperate the rat party is at this point.

[Gay State Conservative]

LAWFARE

[HereInTheHeartland]

Do they include where Trump said to go PEACEFULLY?

[italianquaker]

Zzzzzzz

[Chode]

[FreedBird]

Did the Moderators know in advance this was going to happen last night during the debate. It is odd the question they ask was pertinent.

[usurper]

Mr. Smith laid out extensive arguments for why that post on Twitter should be considered an unofficial act of a desperate losing candidate, rather than the official act of a president that would be considered immune from prosecution under a landmark Supreme Court ruling this summer.

Okay, I'm still waiting for an explanation of how his post on Twitter is a crime whether an unofficial act or not so far I have seen nothing.

Can someone tell me what crime is being alleged here?

[blackdog]

Election interference defined, from the lawfare crowd that charge Trump with election interference. You can’t make this stuff up!!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Can someone tell me what crime is being alleged here?

Running for President.

[sopo]

This is the first thing that comes up when googling when a sealed court filing can be unsealed, refers to some Epstein case, 2019, Second circuit court of appeals:

The Second Circuit also offered guidance to courts on how to PROTECT THE JUDICIAL PROCESS FROM BEING COOPTED TO PROMOTE SCANDAL ARISING OUT OF UNPROVEN AND POTENTIALLY LIBELOUS STATEMENTS It instructed that courts may:
Issue protective orders forbidding dissemination of certain materials and require that filings containing such material be submitted under seal.
Explain on the record that certain statements appear to lack credibility.
Strike material from filings under FRCP 20 because it is redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous.
Impose sanctions under FRCP 11(c).