| |||||||||||||||
Posted on 09/30/2024 10:55:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
That was our own media praising the “elite” Iraq Republican Guard
| |||||||||||||||
Good post⬅
The 'Rats 🐀 are firing 💥 on Fort Sumter - again. They really want to re-fight the 'civil war'.
According to the Food Pantry sorts of groups they don’t care how far past the sell by/ use by date is, as long as the container is sealed and un damaged.
In my own experience one needs to be selective about the container. Heavier plastics that have some color, ie, black, grey, can be 25 year stable. Containers that hold acidic sorts of foods, like say, tomato based, maybe barbeque soss, tend to be long-term-stable. Really light weight, squeezable sorts of containers seem to be good for a year or two, but I don’t trust them for longer.
Most plastic containers have a code on the bottom that sometimes gives a hint as to how long they should last.
If you really want tough jugs for storage the toughest are the red ones rated for fuel. I have a couple that are upwards of 40 years old and still work great. Just label them when new, if you’re gonna use them for something else.
I don’t know his story fully either, but I wonder how much of it is that he’s seen first-hand just how corrupt the media is and so he’s learned not to trust what they say.
And I wonder how many fellow Americans are in the same situation. I hope a lot. We are WAY overdue for people to realize that the “mainstream media” is treasonous.
Wow, isn’t that the truth!
Hmm, I don’t buy them. I’d still put in glass and keep in fridge. And I would avoid any that have preservatives or any other chemicals in them, including “natural flavor” which is a form of MSG. I make my own salad dressings, or used to. Hub doesn’t like them so I don’t make. Mustard I buy in glass jars, I don’t use a lot so a glass jar is okay for us.
I have more in the line when/if I have time. I want MORE time!!!!
Dang I thought he was dead a long time ago.
A couple of video clips of Assange speaking
https://x.com/ultrafrog17/status/1841154903537811492?s=46&t=M3QSPxInPeRU8BOjsiHnHg
NEW: Julian Assange just exposed the CIA in his first public hearing since his release. He says that they tried to assassinate him within the embassy, tried to attain DNA from his sixth-month-old son, had a CIA asset permanently track his wife, and attempted to hack and plant false information. 👀
“We revealed the CIA’s vast production of malware and viruses, it’s subversion of supply chains...CIA Director Pompeo launched a campaign of retribution…
It is now a matter of public record that under Pompeo’s explicit direction, the CIA drew up plans to kidnap and to assassinate me within the Ecuadorian embassy in London and authorize going after my European colleagues, subjecting us to theft, hacking attacks, and the planting of false information.’
My wife and my infant son were also targeted. A CIA asset…was permanently assigned to track my wife, and instructions were given to obtain DNA from my six month old son’s Nappy…
This is the testimony of more than thirty current and former US intelligence officials speaking to the US press, which has been additionally corroborated by record seized in a prosecution bought against some of the CIA agents involved…
The CIA’s targeting of myself my family, and my associates through aggressive extrajudicial and extraterritorial means provides a rare insight into how powerful intelligence organizations engage in transnational repression. Such repressions are not unique. What is unique is that we know so much about this one due to numerous whistleblowers and to judicial investigations in Spain.”
https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1841164037628756435
Julian Assange: The Intelligence Sector pushed for a reinterpretation of the US Constitution.
We angered one of the constituent powers of the United States, the intelligence sector, the security state the secrecy state. It was powerful enough to push for a reinterpretation of the US Constitution. The US First Amendment seems pretty black and white to me It’s very short. It says that Congress shall make no law, restricting speech or the press.
“Looking at the US first amendment to its constitution, that no publisher had ever been prosecuted for publishing, classified information from the United States, either domestically or internationally…
I expected some kind of harassment legal process. I was prepared to fight for that. I believe the value of these publications was such, that it is okay to have that fight. And that we would prevail because we had understood, what was legally possible…
My naivete was believing in the law. When push comes to shove, laws are just pieces of paper, and they can be reinterpreted for political expediency. They are the rules made by the ruling class more broadly and if those rules don’t suit what it wants to do, it reinterprets them, or hopefully changes them, which is clearer in the case of the United States, we angered one of the constituent powers of the United States, the intelligence sector, the security state the secrecy state. It was powerful enough to push for a reinterpretation of the US Constitution. The US First Amendment seems pretty black and white to me It’s very short. It says that Congress shall make no law, restricting speech or the press.”
that’s a wow
Graham does something good. It had better pass. More at link. Too bad not retroactive.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2024/10/read-bill-would-halt-birthright-citizenship-for-children-of-illegal-immigrants/
Bill would halt ‘birthright citizenship’ for children of illegal immigrants
The following is from a press release issued by Sen. Lindsey Graham’s office.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) has introduced a bill to restrict birthright citizenship in the US. The “Birthright Citizenship Act of 2024” aims to stop granting citizenship to children of illegal immigrants and non-immigrants in the US on temporary visas.
Sen. Graham says birthright citizenship is a “major pull factor for illegal immigration” and a “weakness for our national security.” He points out that the US is one of only 33 countries in the world with no restrictions on birthright citizenship. In 2018, Sen. Graham supported former President Trump’s executive order to eliminate birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants born on American soil.
“It is long overdue for the United States to change its policy on birthright citizenship because it is being abused in so many ways,” says Graham. He mentions “birth tourism” as an example, where wealthy individuals from China and other nations come to the US specifically to have a child who would automatically gain American citizenship. According to Sen. Graham, birthright citizenship is one of the largest “magnets that draw people to America.”
Graham criticizes the Biden-Harris administration’s catch-and-release policies, stating they have allowed illegal immigration to “skyrocket.” Over the past 3.5 years, there have been more than 8.3 million encounters with illegal aliens at the southern border, according to Graham.
The bill seeks to specify who can receive citizenship by birth in the US . It includes children born to at least one parent who is either:
A citizen or national of the US,
A lawful permanent resident of the US, or
An alien performing active service in the armed forces.
This legislation would apply only to children born after the date of enactment.
The German family who hosted fake Muslim asylum seeker wants to send him away but he doesn’t want to leave and takes a knife: “It’s my home now!”
https://twitter.com/i/status/1840295831372435497
nice young fellow, not.
Yet, when you are plotting to overtake, intercept, or rendezvous with another vessel, CBDR is what you plot first, then convert the relative motion needed to true course and speed.
IOW, the Deep State is lawless.
The whole world needs to understand that, and Trump and RFK Jr need to work together to dismantle it. Period.
If the CIA did these things to Assange, why should any of us believe they are NOT also doing it to members of Congress, judges, Sharyl Attkisson, etc?
They are using their power to hold the whole world hostage, and that needs to END.
the Daily Mail skewers Timmy
Tonight, Tim Walz will debate JD Vance. But how on Earth can we trust a single word he says? Read our damning audit of all his misleading statements - and even outright lies
ThankQ!
This pic needs checking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
