23 Sep: LIBERATION ON THE WAY! Russian Remnants ARE WITHDRAWING FROM VOVCHANSK

Youtube.com: War in Ukraine Explained ^ | 9-23-2024 11:00 p.m. EDT | Reporting from Ukraine

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

DAILY WAR SUMMATION

War in Ukraine Explained Reporting from Ukraine 544K subscribers 9-23-2024 11:30 p.m. EDT Minutes 4:53 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igi7w9y5EYM

⚠️ Watch RFU in 20 languages: https://www.youtube.com/@RFU/channels

[bimboeruption]

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

Thank you all for your participation to document comments within this forum discussion post.

Review comment of this post to observe revealing Freeper comments.

This post provides insight into observable behavioral dynamics that differentiate comments between 2 major set Freeper groupings.

The ‘First Freeper group’ typically responds with relevant, on-point memes or comments of discussion topic post vs. the ‘Second group comments’ that resort to unfocused meme and or comments unrelated to topic post designed by distractors and detractors to sabotage Freeper discussion.

Freepers of differing political viewpoints can be found in the ‘First’ group. That is the blessing of this Free Republic forum.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

This thread continues. An observation about the word games in one of its comments.

"23 Sep: LIBERATION ON THE WAY! Russian Remnants ARE WITHDRAWING FROM VOVCHANSK | War in Ukraine" -- the title of a monetized YouTube video uploaded from the United States with its associated "merch" store and solicitation of donations.

"Harvest Time🔥Retreat From Toretsk & Vuhledar💥Blackmail With Capitulation⚔️Military Summary 2024.9.23" -- the title of a YouTube video uploaded from Belarus with its associated "merch" store and solicitation of donations.

Two among many "Ukraine-Russia" YouTube videos with opposite messages.

The stance that one set of Ukraine-Russia war-related war videos is true and the opposite false is a matter of confirmation bias, but the promotion of these various YouTube videos is the promotion of "clicks" and "donate" and "subscribe" and the like.

What is assured by many news sources is that the Ukrainian president has just endorsed Kamala Harris and is reported to have politically attacked Trump and Vance, having been flown here by the Harris campaign efforts..

See: Ukrainian President Zelensky Openly Campaigns for Dems in Battleground State, Harris Surrogate PA Governor Josh Shapiro Joins Him to Sign Bombs A FR thread posted on the same day as the others above, 23 September 2024.

"First group" versus "second group" is a dualist construction evidencing no other views are existent or arguable. It -- first group versus second group -- is a dialectic game of words about opinions, not truths.

Here some truths which cannot be labeled propaganda. Non-NATO Ukraine and non-NATO Russia are in a bloody war, losing men and material. Many NATO nations are losing as well, through rising energy costs and increasing and likely unpayable debts to fund the Ukraine-Russia war in some way. Here is another truth: one participant in the Ukraine-Russia war is politicking for Harris-Walz campaign as of 23 September 2024 and per the link above.

There seems a group in this thread of some covertly campaigning in like manner.

Therefore:

Vote Trump/Vance, at the minimum to disrupt the corrupt Democrat machine in Washington. This is an opinion. It is a conservative's opinion and my solid vote. 'Go thou and do likewise' -- suggested to all on this thread.

[rxh4n1]

“Seems like there aren’t many postings that don’t fit your definition of spam.”

No. Huge difference between a one-time link to illustrate a point or a news item and what this one was doing. This one was daily and habitual and always to the same channel.

[rxh4n1]

There’s that one pro-Russian guy, posts his spam weekly, and yes, I’ve called it out too.

[Eleutheria5]

Oooh! More name calling. Here. I put some ice on it. All better. Go to Moscow and get another Liva Snap and a pat on the head.

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

Check “Forward” guidelines for Comment #22
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4266573/posts?page=22#22

Forward Republication Guidelines:
https://forward.com/about-us/republish-forward-content/

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

“First group” versus “second group” is a dualist construction evidencing no other views are existent or arguable.”

This is an INACCURATE comment stated by another Freeper that we have mutually agreed NOT to respond to each other.

This post provides insight into observable behavioral dynamics that differentiate comments between 2 major set Freeper groupings.

The ‘FIRST Freeper group’ typically responds with relevant, on-point memes or comments of discussion topic post vs.

the ‘SECOND group comments’ resort to unfocused memes and or comments unrelated to topic post designed by distractors and detractors to sabotage Freeper discussion.

BOTH Freepers of DIFFERING political viewpoints can be found in the ‘FIRST’ Freeper group.

THIS is the blessing of the Free Republic forum.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4266573/posts?page=42#42

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

UN Commission establishes new evidence of mass torture of Ukrainians
ukrinform.ua
Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 10:04

https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3908814-komisia-oon-vstanovila-novi-dokazi-masovih-katuvan-ukrainciv.html

“The UN Independent International Commission for Investigation of Violations in Ukraine has revealed new evidence of the widespread practice of using torture by the Russian authorities against Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war in the occupied Ukrainian territories and in the Russian Federation.”
- Excerpt

[blitz128]

Disagree, providing a “sample of the text ” may be valid or it may be taken out of context. Providing the link shows the context

Because I say so is not a legitimate debate technique and why papers must have citations.

I have read and listened to many people who make compelling points, many here on FR, but when you check them out, fact check if you will, even their compelling arguments turn out to be false

Example. On many instances people here make claims and I simply ask “what is your source” and the most common response is “I am not your researcher “. If they had provided the source then I could check them and it out and confirm the source to be good or not. By not providing source, monetized or not, then your claims are just so much hot air

Zalinsky mansion story is just one example, just a little digging and you find those claims to be false, but people are still out their “claiming” is is fact

That is why a peer reviewed paper is considered more factual than one that is not
But hey just my 2 cents

[blitz128]

Again I disagree, titles are often skewed to make them sensational and get clicks.
I have read many articles where the title of the article is actually contradicted if you read the whole article.

Since most don’t, that content is buried usually near the end

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

Trump vs Ukraine's president: 'Zelensky is greatest salesman, wants Democrats to win'

Ukrainian President Zelensky Openly Campaigns for Dems in Battleground State, Harris Surrogate PA Governor Josh Shapiro Joins Him to Sign Bombs

Ukraine President Zelensky Campaigns for Kamala Harris in Pennsylvania

Trump says Ukraine's Zelensky wants Democrats to win U.S. presidential election

Vote Trump/Vance, at the minimum to disrupt the corrupt Democrat machine in Washington. This is an opinion. It is a conservative's opinion and my solid vote. 'Go thou and do likewise' -- suggested to all on this thread.

[adorno]

Again I disagree, titles are often skewed to make them sensational and get clicks.

Titles are fine. I can also foresee that the content needs to be read or not. Many don't have valuable content after reading a few lines. I tend to comment on the important information included.

I have read many articles where the title of the article is actually contradicted if you read the whole article.

That happens a lot. But, I do extract into my mind only the information that matters for my comments. Since most don’t, that content is buried usually near the end

[adorno]

If they had provided the source then I could check them and it out and confirm the source to be good or not. By not providing source, monetized or not, then your claims are just so much hot air.

So, you then become the fact-checker and many people will question your qualifications for that task. Whether from 'reliable' or unreliable sources, you then become the 'reliable' or unreliable source There is no single source that contains the entire truth, not when people will disagree with YOUR facts or the facts from any other source. Which is the constant state of information and disinformation on the internet.

But, do try your luck. Your fact-checking may prove to be valuable. But, "WE OUT HERE WILL DECIDE". ;) Can't win for trying, can you. ;)

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

Totally agree with World Traveler once upon a time with his opinion on this:

“This is an opinion. It is a conservative’s opinion and my solid vote. ‘Go thou and do likewise’ — suggested to all on this thread.”

[Eleutheria5]

давай сабака!

[blitz128]

I think we are on the same side here, my point is not to prove or disprove anyone. It is for me to decide with the information I have or am given.

Finding “truth” is a process, and at best I can find myself satisfied with the my research

[2CAVTrooper]

“Hurray. The spam is back.”

No need to announce yourself.

[bimboeruption]

>>>>Thank you all for your participation to document comments within this forum discussion post.

Review comment of this post to observe revealing Freeper comments

This post provides insight into observable behavioral dynamics that differentiate comments between 2 major set Freeper groupings.

The ‘First Freeper group’ typically responds with relevant, on-point memes or comments of discussion topic post vs. the ‘Second group comments’ that resort to unfocused meme and or comments unrelated to topic post designed by distractors and detractors to sabotage Freeper discussion.

Freepers of differing political viewpoints can be found in the ‘First’ group. That is the blessing of this Free Republic forum.<<<<

_________________________________________

Does your globohomo, grifter boss, Zelensky, pay you extra to spy on pro-America FReepers, "REVEREND"?