šæ
p
Bookedmarked, Thanks. This link is going on Fakebook. Bastards.
The scientific community is hopelessly corrupted by the pursuit of money, at the expense of science. I’ve watched in despair as liberalism has crept from academia into the scientific community, to all branches of government and most recently, into the medical community; even our public schools.
Get a rope.
PING
"
(See full-sized Part 1 slidesĀ or see theĀ complete Vaxxed-Unvaxxed presentation, Parts 1-12.)"
The hiding of this data should be a capital crime
And we thought the Nazisā were badā¦ š§
BK MK
There is no reason to be giving that vaccine to an infant.
None.
bkmrk
ransomnote (Post #7): āI'm not sure I posted just the part 1 slides above. The following is a copy from the Children's Health Defense article.
(See full-sized Part 1 slidesĀ or see theĀ complete Vaxxed-Unvaxxed presentation, Parts 1-12.)"
āFor a very long time, many Americans were under the impression that the CDC would not do a Vacc*nated vs. Unvaccinated study on the health outcomes of our children.
But, They actually did, back in 1999. ā
āWhy didnāt we know? Because the results were so d@mning against va((ines, that they deliberately hid it from the public.ā
āBut thanks to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Children's Health Defense,
they were able to obtain the records through a FOIA request several years ago.ā
āSo here it is: A Vacc*nated VS Unvacc*nated Study done by yours truly, the CDC..ā
(the article continues with additional visual bar charts, and information ā¦ please review the information at Children's Health Defense )
------------------------------------------------
(My Opinion) : Who is the CDC defending with not publicly releasing this data ?
Why are parents not warned about the possible adverse health complications from taking these infant shots ?
What ever happened to 'informed consent' requiring 'informed consent' for any injection ?
How is this not a violation of the Nuremberg Code
Who is the CDC really protecting with tax-supported funding ā¦ the public, or Big Pharma ?
And why with tax dollars ?
The CDC is one of the many agencies/departments of Fedgov that needs dismantling as soon as President Trump is back in office. And, of course, many arrests have to happen as well. Makes me very glad I did not have either child vaccinated, except the first one got one. Then no more.
The main point here: Spurious correlation. Someone has taken the time to find correlations where no physical connection exists. Such spurious correlations can be used to “prove” any number of “related” events. For example, drownings in swimming pools correlate to the release of Nicholas Cage movies. These are totally unrelated, but the correlation exists.
In order for an event to be causative of another event, there must be a physical mechanism connecting the two. And here, there simply isn’t.
Plus, I notice that this is posted by ransomnote, who has been diligently posting antivax propaganda for several years now. He (?) is not a credible scientific source.
CDC is murder for hire. Give money to those that ran it and make millions and billions.
vax bookmark