To: nickcarraway
The study, the first of its kind, was based on a single subject: University of California, Irvine cognitive neuroscientist and study co-author Elizabeth Chrastil, a first-time mother who gave birth to a healthy boy, now four and a half years old. Chrastil was 38 during the study, and 43 now. This woman is very old for a first pregnancy.
I don’t think that this study would necessarily present data that is typical for a mother of a more typical first pregnancy age of 16 to 22.
7 posted on
09/19/2024 3:59:30 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Pontiac
16-22 is no longer the typical age of first birth.
9 posted on
09/19/2024 4:03:18 PM PDT by
Valpal1
(Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
To: Pontiac; Valpal1
“”””more typical first pregnancy age of 16 to 22.””””
So far, you appear wrong on that.
28 posted on
09/19/2024 6:08:32 PM PDT by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson