Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
The study, the first of its kind, was based on a single subject: University of California, Irvine cognitive neuroscientist and study co-author Elizabeth Chrastil, a first-time mother who gave birth to a healthy boy, now four and a half years old. Chrastil was 38 during the study, and 43 now.

This woman is very old for a first pregnancy.

I don’t think that this study would necessarily present data that is typical for a mother of a more typical first pregnancy age of 16 to 22.

7 posted on 09/19/2024 3:59:30 PM PDT by Pontiac (esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

16-22 is no longer the typical age of first birth.


9 posted on 09/19/2024 4:03:18 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac; Valpal1

“”””more typical first pregnancy age of 16 to 22.””””

So far, you appear wrong on that.


28 posted on 09/19/2024 6:08:32 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson