Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac

16-22 is no longer the typical age of first birth.


9 posted on 09/19/2024 4:03:18 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1

In most of the world it is, if not earlier.


13 posted on 09/19/2024 4:12:33 PM PDT by Pontiac (esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1

In most of human history it would be even younger.

Although most of this first children would not survive.

It was in most of history said that the first two children were for the crows.

My grandmother’s first, third and forth pregnancies were stillborn or died in infancy.


14 posted on 09/19/2024 4:16:48 PM PDT by Pontiac (esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson