Replies

I do.

I also know when I’m being strung along.

The most credible story of Trump’s election 2020 unraveling came from Patrick Byrne.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3931465/posts

I find Byrne to be a bit of a self-aggrandizer. But his description of what happened and went wrong rings (largely) true.

If so, the reality is less sensational….there was no Deep State threat, no Spy vs Spy drama, no Michael Corleone in the wings. Basically, Trump put the football into the hands of friends who were not capable of winning.

As I wrote then, I still think Powell got caught up in the moment - the Kracken comment and countless times she was on TV swearing she’s not trying this case in the court of public opinion, torpedoed many people’s opinions of her. Including me...I want my lawyer to be competent, not a showboater. That’s why I believe Byrne gravitated to Powell...affinity-bias.

I do NOT believe there was a Deep State threat - there was no need. Powell imploded. That answer is less juicy, but it’s closer to the truth.

Do I think ABC et al colluded with the Harris camp? Yes. Do I believe the moderators were biased? You bet. Do I think Harris is the most incompetent, bumbling Veep since Dan Quayle and would be a terrible President? Unequivocally.

Do I think this notarized statement is a distraction? Yes…I hope I’m wrong. But I suspect I’m not.