I see nothing -- I see nothing
Where is Donna Brazile these days?
Somebody here said it earlier, he says he has recordings, they won’t know what lies to tell.
I would usually say it’s in their best interests to say nothing yet since they immediately jumped on the Twitter reports several days ago and refuted the debate was rigged, this is not a good look.
So it’s true then.
Imho if it is true, The alleged affidavit does a good job of boxing ABC in
Close collaboration is a fancy way to say, they rehearsed it? I can believe that.
It’s quite possible that some morning this week Good Morning America will have to get to the bottom of this and will likely have to apologize to not only President Trump and MAGA supporters but also to the American people for participating in election interference.
Bombshell my ass.
What’s wrong, ABC? Haitian Cats got your tongue?
and the fcc and fec investigations begins when?
ABC will bury it of course if they can, but billionaire hedge fund owner Bill Ackman is bringing the heat to ABC’s top boss, Bob Eisner at Disney. If heat turns to fire, it will happen there, where stock price can be affected, the last thing Disney needs is another scandal and cover-up:
https://x.com/BillAckman/status/1835497041151300069
What if anything are the other MSM “news” agencies writing/saying about this alleged election interference with allegedly fake moderator-journalists?
Silence is consent…
Linsey Davis already admitted to it. So you could say she was the whistleblower.
Yeah, but we’re a threat to democracy, right ABC?
This is interesting, by holding back the hard evidence, if ABC commits to anything, they can be shown to lie.
Notarization means nothing regarding the truth of the statements, it only means that a notary witnessed the signature and attest to that signature being consistent with some id information presented at the time or that the person signing is personally known to the notary. This document does not appear to be part of any court proceeding - so there is no further assurance of its validity. I’m not saying its false, but this, by itself is proof of almost nothing. If it was filed in a federal court, there would be perjury and Rule 11 sanctions potential that would suggest its credibility. But this is just a piece of paper.
They’re having their lawyers take a look at things.
They can’t comment. The affiant claims to have audio recordings. ABC has no idea what is on those recordings, if they exist at all. So they have to stay mute. They can’t rebut anything less the be ridiculed by their own words.