Posted on 09/13/2024 5:45:53 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
I asked yesterday morning whether Kamala Harris’ camp got the ABC News debate questions in advance. The vice president was visibly nervous for the first portion of the debate but got into a groove,
I’m not saying this is fact, but if this is true, it’s a major scandal:
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
The fact there's an affidavit swearing on this-does it make it true? The rats are more prepared for things like this.
Well, ABC News denied it, so it must be so…
Its not a scandal at all, its standard operating procedure. If you have no ethics there's nothing to scandalize.
She couldn’t answer the first question. Falling into this trap is tacitly admitting that you think Trump lost. He did not.
“ABC whistleblower allegedly will release an affidavit”
allegedly?
I suspect the chances of seeing this “affidavit” are about the same as the chances of seeing the Michelle Obama “whitey” tape.
I suggest we wait for the signed and sworn affidavit to come out and for the Whistleblower to identify himself/herself before jumping to conclusions.
Ear piece
SHOCK CLAIM: Kamala Was Given ‘Sample’ Questions by ABC Prior to Debate
Turned out to be the same questions asked by moderators.
September 12, 2024, By Baruch Green, vinnews.com
(VINnews) — Allegations are that an ABC whistleblower has signed an affidavit, saying the Kamala Harris campaign was given “sample questions” in advance of the debate, which (conveniently) turned out to be the same questions asked by moderators.
In addition, the claim states that ABC assured the Harris campaign that they would be fact-checking President Trump. The allegations were reported by Newsweek as well as other media outlets, however it should be noted the claims are unverified.
An X account named “Black Insurrectionist” posted the following:
“I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”
The bombshell allegation was amplified by multiple conservative MAGA X accounts.
Bill Ackman responded by posting: “If this turns out to be true, this is a serious breach of journalistic ethics and a death blow to @ABCNetwork reputation.”
ABC moderators have been accused of being heavily biased against Trump, with many saying the debate was 3-1. In addition, Kamala, not known for her debate prowess, performed quite well, adding to the suspicion that there was rigging in her favor. She also has personal connections to the leadership of ABC news.
In addition, it should be noted that Donna Brazille, former campaign manager for Hillary Clinton in 2016, is a contributor at ABC News. It it well-known that Brazille was given debate questions in advance of the Democrat primary debates in 2016 by CNN.
That said, the reports are as yet unconfirmed.
I was here on FR when the story broke the See BS report on GWB’s national guard service was a complete hoax- and they laughed at us- until it was proven that it was true.
Does an affidavit prove it’s true?? No- but i don’t care...the russian collusion hoax, hunter’s laptop, DJT being in on Project 2025, and on and on and on...
The criminal liberal media gets away with all their lies- if this is not true let them sweat out the lies against them...
Here is muir’s FB page for those interested
https://www.facebook.com/davidmuirabc
One can believe that Kamrade was fed the questions AND believe that Trump still won.
How does a totally corrupt organization devoid of morals go about doing anything scandalous? It’s state run media, nothing to see here.
As of this morning, he is still awaiting this document, FWIW.
If a tree falls in the forest, and nobody heard it, did it happen?
The MSM will be torn. 20 or 30 years ago, most major outlets would have been more than happy to out or expost a competative media outlet for a scandal.
But today, the magnetic pull of the MSM moths to the flame of the DNC and establishment is a powerfully loyal force.
(if it is true) I predict the majority of MSM will make sure this doesn’t get big.
If true it would be no real surpise, just ABC living down to its reputation as one of the virtual media arms of the DNC.
Wouldn’t be surprised. It’s probably been standard practice now for the MSM to coordinate with the Democrat candidate. There’s really no difference now between the MSM and the Democrat party.
“””I asked yesterday morning whether Kamala Harris’ camp got the ABC News debate questions in advance.””””
Or was it the Kamala camp who gave ABC the debate questions in advance????
In 2012, Candy Crowley argued with then–GOP nominee Mitt Romney about Benghazi, and ran interference for Obama.
In 2016, Donna Brazile had tipped off the Clinton campaign in advance to town-hall questions in the debate with Donald Trump.
There are a lot of common factors underlying so many of the selections of these “unbiased” moderators.
I suppose that’s true, except that she couldn’t answer the first question. Are we better off than we were four years ago?
Both camps knew what the questions were going to be. I do suspect that the Harris camp was informed that Harris would not be fact-checked during the debate and Trump would.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.