Skip to comments.
Magical equation unites quantum physics, Einstein’s general relativity in a first
Intersting engineering ^
| 09/07/2024
| Rupendra Brahambhatt
Posted on 09/08/2024 8:54:56 AM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/08/2024 8:54:56 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2
posted on
09/08/2024 9:02:39 AM PDT
by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: SunkenCiv
The obtained equation is covariant in space-time and invariant with respect to any Planck scale.
3
posted on
09/08/2024 9:03:52 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: BenLurkin
I have more than a passing interest in physics. But the author never bothers to say who the researchers are, or where they work. They are just “the researchers”. I find that quite odd. Is the author just sloppy?
There are links in the article. The links lead to very technical stuff that I can follow, but will require more coffee.
4
posted on
09/08/2024 9:07:40 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: BenLurkin
5
posted on
09/08/2024 9:08:27 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: BenLurkin
Yes, you have the quantum for the micro world, and you have relativity for our world. But what about for the macro world? The macro world would be the way things work on the very large scale. An analogy would be, if we existed in the micro level with the quantum world, what would be the world of relativity? It would be one size larger than our world.
Some might say there are no laws pertaining to a macro world. How can we know for sure?
6
posted on
09/08/2024 9:11:49 AM PDT
by
BEJ
To: Leaning Right
It’s just Indian clickbait with a lotta geewhiz BS that’s old news.
7
posted on
09/08/2024 9:12:07 AM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: BenLurkin; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
8
posted on
09/08/2024 9:18:29 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: BenLurkin
Worried about physics when a fungus is about to destroy the world’s banana crop? Get real.
9
posted on
09/08/2024 9:23:02 AM PDT
by
Fungi
To: Fungi
“Nevermind that s___, Here Comes Mongo!”
10
posted on
09/08/2024 9:24:11 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Fungi
Yup. The Banana Famine is upon us and the Strategic Banana Reserve’s just about tapped out. And all these guys can talk about is the fine structure of the universe.
To: Fungi
> Worried about physics when a fungus is about to destroy the world’s banana crop? <
Yeah, I miss the days when physicists did something practical, like maybe working on a better way to transmit power over long distances.
Now they spend (waste?) all their time, money, and effort investigating things like string theory. By the way, there is no hard experimental evidence for string theory at all. Yet it’s a big deal. Kinda like chasing after imaginary unicorns because someone drew a picture of one.
Side point: I taught college freshman physics for a time. But I knew I had no future in college teaching. As you can see from above, I have the wrong attitude.
12
posted on
09/08/2024 9:42:23 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: BenLurkin; SunkenCiv
“The masses of electrons, muons, and tau can be explained by the different curvatures of universe, galaxy, and solar system, respectively.” I say as Richard Feynman would have said: BS!
13
posted on
09/08/2024 9:47:55 AM PDT
by
AdmSmith
(GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
To: BenLurkin
14
posted on
09/08/2024 10:14:51 AM PDT
by
broken_clock
(Go Trump! Still praying.)
To: BenLurkin
In Medieval times the Holy Grail of understanding everything was the Philosophers Stone. Issac Newton himself pursued Alchemy in trying to find it. I mention this because the modern equivalent is the Unified Grand Theory of Everything. The attempt to create some theory that united Quantum Mechanics with Einstein's General Relativity is a pursuit over a century old now. If this paper succeeds a Nobel Prize in Physics will be well earned. ( Even though the Nobel Peace Prize is worth about as much as a Cracker Jack prize)
15
posted on
09/08/2024 10:19:56 AM PDT
by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: Leaning Right
Here is a
link to the actual paper.
16
posted on
09/08/2024 10:35:09 AM PDT
by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: BenLurkin
there are a couple quite plausible theoretical connections between quantum field theory and Einstein’s theory of general relativity. the maths apparently work out pretty well. we await some verification, experimental validation...
(which will then certainly result in Nobel prizes, this is somewhat analogous to how Bell’s Theorum questioning local causality and thus Einstein’s firm gut feelings about the matter ... did not result in any Nobel prizes until there was experimental evidence for it years later)
17
posted on
09/08/2024 10:46:45 AM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: BenLurkin
So now, what use will mad scientists employed by Bill Gates, Klaus Schwabb, George Soros & Noel Yuval Harari make of this, to afflict billions of ordinary people who just want to mind their own business & be left alone?
To: BenLurkin
Kamala H. is a co-author of this delirium...
19
posted on
09/08/2024 10:54:57 AM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: Fungi
if quantum fungus, then forget it
20
posted on
09/08/2024 11:16:06 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist! )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson