Posted on 09/01/2024 2:40:26 PM PDT by ransomnote
Remdesivir is described as a “broad spectrum antiviral drug.” It is an RNA polymerase inhibitor which disrupts the production of vital RNA. It is said to prevent the multiplication of SARS-CoV-2. Remdesivir was introduced for the treatment of covid-19 patients who were in hospital suffering from covid-19, with or without pneumonia. It is still being widely used. I have been researching and writing about drugs since 1970 and I am appalled at the way that it now appears that in some countries some hospitals and doctors (and even nurses) are now routinely giving remdesivir to patients – particularly elderly patients – who do not have severe signs and/or symptoms of the flu or a flu-like viral infection. You can form your own opinion on whether remdesivir ever has a value by reading the following information.
1. Remdesivir is officially used to treat patients who have symptoms of covid-19 or who have covid-19 according to the discredited PCR test which no one with any functioning brain tissue should use. Anyone who uses a PCR test to diagnose covid-19 is a moron and you can tell them I said that. Please see my two recent articles (on http://www.vernoncoleman.com) entitled `PCR: How the PCR test has killed millions’ and `The PCR test can kill you’. A positive PCR test does NOT prove that you have covid-19, dandruff, chilblains or anything else.
2. Remdesivir seems to be very, very popular with very, very stupid doctors who seem to think it is a panacea for all illnesses. If their Mercedes or BMW breaks down, they probably give the car a shot of remdesivir.
3. Remdesivir is given directly into a vein. Doctors who tell you that giving drugs via a vein is an entirely safe procedure are stupid. No medical procedure is entirely safe. Giving drugs by injection into a bloodstream requires skill and experience to avoid dangers.
4. The brand name of remdesivir is Veklury. (Brand names always begin with an initial capital but generic names are all lowercase.) If you are being given Veklury, you are being given remdesivir.
5. Remdesivir should be prescribed by a doctor and given under a doctor’s supervision. (Nurses may wear stethoscopes round their necks, but they are not doctors.)
6. Remdesivir must be given slowly, over a period of between 30 minutes and 120 minutes.
7. Hospital patients are usually given remdesivir once a day for up to 10 days.
8. Patients not in hospital are usually given remdesivir once a day for three days.
9. Patients who are given remdesivir MUST have regular blood tests to check that their livers are functioning properly. If a doctor gives remdesivir without doing regular liver function tests he or she is dangerous and, in my opinion, should have their medical licence revoked.
10. Liver function tests MUST be done before remdesivir is prescribed. Any doctor who does not do liver tests before starting treatment should be sacked and have their medical licence revoked.
11. Severe renal toxicity has been noted in animal studies. (Some doctors claim that animal studies are irrelevant. I agree. But why do them if they are irrelevant?)
12. No one should be given remdesivir if they are allergic to it.
13. Anyone who has ever had liver disease or kidney disease should inform their doctor if he/she suggests prescribing remdesivir.
14. Anyone who is pregnant or breastfeeding should tell their doctor. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (“NICE”) says that the safety of covid-19 antiviral treatment during pregnancy has NOT been established.
15. Remdesivir may interact, to your disadvantage, with other prescription medicines, with over-the-counter medicines, with vitamins and with herbal products. Doctors who prescribe remdesivir must ask patients about all the medicines they are taking.
16. Remdesivir has received a number of reviews on drugs.com, and of the reviews listed on 24 August 2024, 19.38% of reviewers had a “positive experience” but 47% had a “negative experience.”
17. According to the journal ‘Science’, in October 2020, “The World Health Organisation’s Solidarity Trial showed that remdesivir does not reduce mortality or the time covid-19 patients take to recover.” And “a second, smaller placebo-controlled study of remdesivir on hospitalised covid-19 patients in China, published online by The Lancet on 29th April 2020, found no statistically significant benefit from the treatment – and the antiviral surprisingly had no impact on levels of the coronavirus.” I find it difficult to see why the FDA, the EU and the UK’s drug regulator all approved remdesivir, though they appear to have done so without worrying too much about the research showing that it was pretty useless.MORE AT LINK: https://expose-news.com/2024/08/30/remdesivir-what-you-must-know/
Look what the cat dug up, and, dragged in ... from way deep. 😂
Thank the Lord.
So many didn’t know to even refuse. They listened to these Pharma funded docs.
See my post a few posts upthread.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Remdesivir – What You Must Know, DugwayDuke wrote: Are you aware that Coleman is not longer a doctor? He relinquished his medical licence in March 2016 and is no longer registered or licensed to practice as a GP
It's okay - when he retired he did not have his memory wiped of all that he learned in 46 years of practicing medicine. Interesting guy - he's been warning the public for years and no one listened before.
Wikipedia is CIA controlled, and although they smear him as a 'conspiracy theorist', reading his background impresses me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon_Coleman
Coleman qualified as a physician in 1970 and worked as a GP. In 1981, the Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) fined him for refusing to write the diagnoses on sick notes, which he considered a breach of patient confidentiality.[7]
After publishing his first book, The Medicine Men, in 1976, which accused the National Health Service of being controlled by pharmaceutical companies, Coleman left the NHS.[4][8][9]
In 1995, Coleman published the book How to Stop Your Doctor Killing You, which the Advertising Standards Authority later subjected to an advertisement ban.[15]
Coleman went on to work as a newspaper columnist for a number of publications, including The Sun and The Sunday People,[4] where he was an agony uncle (ransomnote: advice columnist) until he resigned in 2003.[16][17][18]
He relinquished his medical licence in March 2016 and is no longer registered or licensed to practice as a GP.[19]
—-> He relinquished his medical licence in March 2016 and is no longer registered or licensed to practice as a GP.
Some are blessed to escape the Pharma Plantation.
To many others choose money over promoting health.
Just a reminder that when you engage in ad hominem attacks it means that you lost the argument.
Your post has nothing to do with the content of the article.
Brush up on your logical fallacies.
“For those of us who’ve noticed that people who’ve taken the mRNA vax and boosters seem different psychologically, we’re not imagining that.”
“No. It’s what’s really happening.”
Michael Nehls, MD, PhD (@NehlsMD), a molecular geneticist, immunologist, author, and educator, describes for Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) how the COVID injections affect a recipient’s hippocampus—that is, the part of the brain that’s involved in many cognitive functions, including memory and learning.
———-
… you can see it on these threads.
He’s insinuating that the author’s credentials are dubious instead of arguing about the actual content of the post. That’s textbook ad hominem.
Standard MO.
Not when the person is presenting themselves as a medical authority.
Had they said he’s just an idiot, then yes.
Not sure, but please bear in mind Bill Gates thinks (and has stipulated) that the world is over populated. Most people die from the treatments, especially the vaccines for COVID.
He’s a doctor with decades of experience. Even so, if the information presented is credible, his credentials don’t matter. If Joe the garbage collector did the research and came to the same conclusions, his data is no more valid and no less valid. You argue the point, not the person.
With a doc in the family who was big on the vaxx. Killed him, too.
“I rember reading that Remdisivir was originally developed as a treatment for Ebola. I wonder what happened with those trials? Did they find that the drug was dangerous as well as being ineffective?”
They STOPPED using Remdesivir to treat Ebola because of it’s toxicity!!!!!!
I’d be more open to your argument if people really relied on peer reviewed research and not on any crackpot that says something that you are already inclined to think is true.
A surgeon in my family died from COVID before the vax was available.
What is the safer alternative?
Ivermectin
Hydroxychloroquine
On December 24, 2020 all my ICU beds (20) were filled with COVID, as well as 48 floor beds which had been converted to ICU airborne isolation standards.
68 hospitalized COVID patients.
All that stuff was taken down by August 2021.
It’s rare now, and has been for 3 years, to see anyone hospitalized for COVID. We had 2 deaths in 2022, one in 2023, and none this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.