Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jamestown1630

Exactly. Just the ease of travel can spread diseases globally, especially airborne diseases.

When it comes to vector-borne diseases, it’s much easier to contain when it’s just one or two here and there. When it’s groups, it gets much harder. Look at the Yellow Fever outbreak of 1783 in Philadelphia, for example (sudden influx of groups from endemic area). Zika became a worry here with the arrival of groups of immigrants from endemic areas, but, so far at least, better contained thanks to modern methods.

Yes, we would still have diseases carried via international travel. Allowing millions to cross our southern border with no health checks and no record of ingress and destination(s) (as opposed to legal travellers) means it’s harder to trace those spreading diseases and contain the spread, so it’s somewhat more problematic.

I think we’re on the same page here?


19 posted on 08/19/2024 3:08:06 PM PDT by CatHerd (Let's not forget FR is a Christian site and do our best to honor that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CatHerd

I think we are; but we still have to figure out how to instruct migrating birds to stay out of the U.S. :-)


21 posted on 08/19/2024 3:37:07 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson