Posted on 08/13/2024 10:00:52 AM PDT by cba123
Tulsi Gabbard, a former House member who ran for president in 2020 as a Democrat and then left the party, on Wednesday embraced the idea of joining Donald J. Trump as his running mate on the Republican ticket.
“If asked to serve in that way, I would be honored to do so,” Ms. Gabbard said in response to a question from the audience during a speech at the Richard M. Nixon Library and Museum in California. She was promoting her book about her estrangement from the political left...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
JD is heads and shoulders above GHWB, Quayle, Cheney, and Pence!!! What’s there not to like?
No thanks. I don’t want a life-long RAT who endorsed, and actively campaigned for commie Bernie Sanders for President in 2016 one breath away from the Presidency. Then she ran for President as a RAT in 2020. It’s been less than 2 years since she claims she left the RAT party. She’s as big a chameleon and opportunist as Kamala Harris, Michael Bloomberg, and the rest of the liberals who could only get elected by changing their party affiliation, but not changing their RAT mindset.
It's been less than two years since Gabbard claims she left the RAT party. It's been 15 years since Trump changed from RAT to Republican. Try to get your facts straight.
🛵
Trump should definitely switch out Vance for Tulsi if he longs to lose.
Or do they still keep him in a glass case?
You can make your points without being belligerent. Trump makes mistakes, the same ones over and over. The school yard name calling - "stupid" "bird brain" etc. - make him look like, A, he's got nothing else and, B, he's an asshole. We'd rather he sticks to THE THINGS THEY DO and bring the receipts. Biden's a crook and caused much of today's inflation and here's why ... Harris is an incompetent radical and here's why. Walz is even more radical and here's why.
Saying that anyone who critiques him is "shilling for the ho" is lazy argumentation and makes conservatives look dumb.
My unofficial survey shows that about 96% of said commenter’s comments contain insults.
“THUG 5.” Sounds vaguely racist, although what doesn’t anymore?
Please report yourself for changing the title of the article. Have it changed to the published title. I think there are some rules about that.
Well, now that we’ve established that this article is 2 1/2 months old, the answer is still no.
You Tulsi fanboys really need to pack your loins with ice already..
No
You Tulsi fanboys really need to pack your loins with ice already..
That gives new meaning to “Just Chill.” 🤭
your are an idiot? hello, pot.......
She didn't, she mad the statement like a year ago. She knows Vance is the VP pick and supports him.
Reality of the country’s mood plus after thought equals wishful thinking on the part of nyt’s staff. Tough tish Vance is the man. I trust Vance to carry the ball forward if Trump is removed. They evidently do too.
No, I believe the man said (and meant) that anyone who wants Trump to dump Vance for Tulsi Gabbard is shilling for the ho.
Not "anyone who critiques him."
See the difference?
Vance’s recent interview with Dana Bash changed the minds of a few I know. Something I haven’t been able to do in years. So I will have to disagree.
... and, despite what they say, just as was Trump, Harris remains the “presumptive nominee” until formally announced (or installed as one may prefer) at the convention next week.
There however is a slight possibility…
Vance does not seem to strongly contribute to picking up votes.
He is a great guy. But Tulsi directly pulls strongly from the Dems’ voters.
I don’t think he does.
However that is just my opinion. Worth what you paid for it.
🐘
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.