No.
You should have posted that as its own thread.
I posted that fragment of another post several times in several forms. I get the sense from your post and your replies to others that you have a slightly misguided understanding of the role of the "government of the United States" as intended by the Framers.
If I restated your opening sentence to:
TheWould you say that was an equivalent sentiment to what you wrote?governmentPresident of The United States exists to serve ALL the citizens of The United States.
If I restated your second sentence to:
TheWould that sentiment still fit your 20 enumerated items?governmentPresident of The United States DOES NOT exist to serve the following:
If you thought my first post was too long, then you will hate this post, which is the most recent one of mine where I lifted that content. It was my conclusion to a much larger post on the role of the Senate in the federal government, and how the Senate was intended to be the voice of the states to keep the role of the federal government true to its purpose.
Much of what "the government of United States" does today goes against what many of the states want, and the federal government has been suing the states that are trying to rein it in. But the federal government was intended to be small, and to use the states themselves to watch out for each other on behalf of the entire United States.
If you have the stomach for it, I suggest that you read my linked post and then we can have a discussion on it, either here or over there.
FReegards,
-PJ