All YOU can eat, not all everyone at the table can eat!
That is what started the problem. Her continued behavior is what got her arrested.IMO she KNEW what she was doing, and dared the manager to do something about it...they did, and I salute the police for doing their job.
Depends on your interpretation.
Woman shares her appetizer.
Management calls police.
After police are on scene, which is after she shared the appetizer, she was arrested.
Therefore, the headline was true. She was arrested AFTER she shared her appetizer. Now, if the headline read that she was arrested BECAUSE she shared the appetizer, then that would not be accurate. "She was formally charged with disorderly conduct, a Class B misdemeanor."
Agree. She was arrested for disorderly conduct, not sharing her appetizer. Most people would just either leave or accept the rules of the establishment. She became belligerent instead.
Exactly. she was NOT arrested for sharing the meal. That is the explicit implication of that headline though.
Yes. Arrested for disorderly conduct.