Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519
There is a reason we do not refer to Colonel Custer as General Custer even though he held that rank for a bit.
16 posted on 08/06/2024 8:40:05 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Roses are red, Violets are blue, I love being on the government watch list, along with all of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“There is a reason we do not refer to Colonel Custer as General Custer even though he held that rank for a bit.”

Because during the Civil War, Custer was a Major General in the U.S. Volunteers. After the war he received his commission into the U.S. Army as a Colonel.


43 posted on 08/06/2024 9:25:52 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“There is a reason we do not refer to Colonel Custer as General Custer even though he held that rank for a bit.”

I’ve read that the officers in the post-Civil War Regular Army referred to each other by their former ranks. All unofficial, of course, but they considered it a courtesy amongst themselves. I guess it was also part of being in the West point club. So, Custer was referred to as General.


54 posted on 08/06/2024 9:53:58 PM PDT by rxh4n1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson