Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

Another problem is using the word “secession.” That immediately brings to mind the Civil War and the acceped principle that secession is not allowed. I don’t think success lies in that direction.

I’d recommend to anyone who wants to have an actual discussion, try talking about “Partition,” as in the 1940s partition of India and Pakistan. I’m not saying I favor partition, either. But you may get a much bigger audience by shifting to partition as agreed to by both partiws, than sticking with secession by an unhappy party


12 posted on 08/06/2024 11:26:56 AM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinnatus.45-70

““Partition,” as in the 1940s partition of India and Pakistan.”

For those who don’t recall that was a total bloodbath.

Some of the Eastern Europe breakups after the fall of the Soviet Union are probably a more pleasant example—even though of course Yugoslavia became a hot mess.

Our situation is much worse—we are dealing with power mad leftists who want to hurt us and cause us pain—wherever we are.

The notion that good faith negotiation is possible with such people is beyond belief.


16 posted on 08/06/2024 11:32:30 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70

> I’d recommend to anyone who wants to have an actual discussion, try talking about “Partition,” … <

You’re right. Good thinking.

Side note: The partition of India and Pakistan devolved into a bloody mess. On the other hand, the partition of the old USSR was rather peaceful. So it will be interesting (for the lack of a better word) to see which direction the US will ultimately take.

And I suppose there will be a partition, even if it’s a 100 years from now. That always seems to be the end game for “diverse” societies.


17 posted on 08/06/2024 11:35:15 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70

> I’d recommend to anyone who wants to have an actual discussion, try talking about “Partition,” as in the 1940s partition of India and Pakistan. I’m not saying I favor partition, either. But you may get a much bigger audience by shifting to partition as agreed to by both partiws, than sticking with secession by an unhappy party

might be a good idea.

as for india-pakistan bloodbath consideration, in practice no one in the usa pays attention to foreign affairs anyways (at least not until there is a sinking of the maine, zimmerman telegram, pearl harbor, or equivalent).


42 posted on 08/06/2024 12:16:01 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson