Jackass.
There is a difference between a plane that is one or maybe two years old(787 max) and a plane that is over 15 years old and has how many thousands of hours on its frame. You know damn well AA or Delta have their own mechanics to service their assets. 787 max are probably under some form of warranty or extended service from Boeing.
in this instance, Boeing terminated an employee over their concerns of airplane integrity and shoddy assembly.
this is 100% Boeings fault.
but a tire exploding on a 20 year old plane is Boeings fault how? because it’s a 767?
Use your damn brain and stop being a snarky asshat.
There is a obvious line between the problems and you are trying to be snarky blurring the two. the 787 Max is a disaster that should put Boeing out of operations. Their older models are clearly still very safe when maintained correctly.
this is 100% Boeings fault.
but a tire exploding on a 20 year old plane is Boeings fault how? because it’s a 767?
Well, maybe -- and, yes, I'm speculating -- maybe some mechanic noticed that a 20-year-old plane had an old tire that looked likely to explode. Maybe the mechanic flagged that issue. Maybe the mechanic was terminated.
Because, you know, Boeing does that sort of thing.