"Highly provocative"? Are eastern European countries free or not?
NATO is only a threat the way a bulletproof vest is a threat to a gun.
Posted on 06/27/2024 5:09:38 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
When German-born Kim Dotcom talks about "the US", he sounds like me talking about "the Globalists". Speaking on the The Alex Jones Show, Kim says that the US is leading the world into a nuclear war, to avoid facing up to its crimes.
He says the an asset-based BRICS currency would be preferred for trade by virtually every country over the US dollar, where you risk being impetuously sanctioned over some BS that isn't even true.
Kim says, "My big worry is that, you know, once the realization sinks in that this is not reversible, that Russia and China are not going to back off, that the US will go all-in and say, 'Well, then, you know, if we are going down, we're taking the world down with us.'"
###
30% of all taxes that are being collected by the US Government go into interest payments, now. That money is not used for anything other than paying down the interest on debt, while the debt increases by $1 trillion dollars every three months. The US is financially completely, excuse the language, f@cked.
Because all US debt, combined with all US unfunded liabilities, meaning, funding that the US has to provide in the future, is already higher than all US assets, combined. So that means everything that Americans own, everything that US businesses own, every piece of land, every piece of assets in the United States is valued at $207 trillion. But the combined debt and unfunded liability of the US is already $316 trillion.
It means the US is already completely bankrupt. And when there is no more money printing based on the reserve currency status that the US has, it's going under. It's a complete economic collapse…
(Excerpt) Read more at forbiddennews.substack.com ...
Yet there probably won’t be one serious question about it at tonight’s debate. Or if a question is actually asked, I predict no real plans on how they plan to deal with it will be presented. Because the only way to deal with it is to cut spending, which few politicians want to even talk about, much less actually do. Kennedy has been talking about our need of actual spending cuts, which is probably one of the main reasons he wasn’t even invited.
links please.
links please.
https://x.com/TheTruth712121/status/1676174018993352704/video/1 Russian President Vladimir Putin denies that Russia is planning to invade.
https://www.npr.org/2022/01/10/1071766987/u-s-russia-dicuss-ukraine-can-diplomacy-help-avoid-a-military-confrontation
Putin said that Russia was acting in self-defense, that its goal was the "demilitarization and denazification" of Ukraine, and claimed that Russia had no plans to occupy Ukrainian land. He threatened severe consequences for any country that intervened.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_conducting_a_special_military_operation
Putin attacked Ukraine after insisting for months there was no plan to do so. Now he says there's no plan to take over.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-ukraine-putin-invasion-after-denials-now-says-no-occupation-plan/
Lots can change when a promise is repeatedly threatened to be broken.
It is highly provocative to continually discuss/make arrangements for Ukraines acceptance into NATO. Lots can change when US politicians are filmed with Ukranian soldiers, including Azov (a decade ago during ‘peace’) offering weapons to use towards Russia.
If people are unable to see how we carry quite a bit of responsibility on how this war even began… then - there’s a serious issue right there. Some self awareness , as a nation, is required.
"Highly provocative"? Are eastern European countries free or not?
NATO is only a threat the way a bulletproof vest is a threat to a gun.
Good question...why forgo seventy five years of peaceful coexistence and economic ties that survived Soviet communism and the Cold war?
A combination of incompetent Finnish leadership, Anglo gaslighting, and EU coercion would be my guess. A little bit ironic considering how badly the Finns misread Soviet intentions during their negotiations in 1939.
Putin's reaction was a response to the shelling by Kiev of Eastern Ukraine. Ethnic Russian Women and children were being murdered. Did you expect no response?
incompetent Finnish leadership, Anglo gaslighting, and EU coercion would be my guess.
Yes, my friend, it had nothing to do with Putin seizing 20% of Georgia, and then trying to seize 100% of Ukraine. Okay
Yup, everything was fine before 2014.
2004 poisoning of the Ukrainian president Yushchenko by Russia.
Your rhetoric falls squarely into the ‘Anglo gaslighting’ category.
This is quite plausible. Consider the idiots that now infest our government and military. They haven’t won a major war since Desert Storm and foreign policy wise they haven’t got anything right since Reagan left office. When Reagan left office the adults for the most part went with him. Aside from the reprieve of Trump who realized the world has changed since 1991, and tried to adapt US strategic foreign policy into something that actually worked, the rest blunder forward leaving a trail of failures and destruction acting like nothing has changed since 1965.
Now we are supposed to believe that the Russians will never use nukes, only we can and will use them. They discount human nature and believe their own rhetoric which is dangerous. The fact of the matter is when we had political idiots in office our enemies knew the US military could and would use nuclear weapons and we had deterrence. At this point our military “leadership” and I use that term laughingly couldn’t deter a crack addict because they are no longer respected by their own people or our enemies.
Could the Russians use nukes, yes under the right circumstances. Are they likely too, no. But if we miscalculate and they do all the naysayers and experts will be going, but wait, we didn’t mean for that to happen, time out! Except there will be no time out, only an oh sh*t moment upon impact of the nukes.
Both of whom have been far more accurate and truthful than the majority of the media over the last decades.
Before which an armed uprising was started in Ukraine by heavily armed Russians, led by a former GRU colonel, who entered Ukraine, and this all occurred without the approval of the Russian government?
In April 2014, armed conflict began in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukraine. On 12 April, a fifty-man unit of pro-Russian militants seized the towns of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk. The heavily armed men were Russian Armed Forces "volunteers" under the command of former GRU colonel Igor Girkin ('Strelkov'). They had been sent from Russian-occupied Crimea and wore no insignia. Girkin said that this action sparked the Donbas War. He said "I'm the one who pulled the trigger of war. If our unit hadn't crossed the border, everything would have fizzled out".
Which is why Jones is being forced to liquidate his entire business to pay the libel judgements against him.
I repeat: ROFLMAO.
Dang! This one brought all the zeepers to the yard. It’s almost like the reaction when a RevMom summoning of the flying monkeys goes out. 😂
Please stay focused. I asked for a link for your Putin assertions. You avoided the request while offering nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.