[Kazan]

NATO is the defense against Russia's aggressive policies.

That's a lie as I have proven over and over again.

It's are meddling in Ukraine, NATO expanding to Russia's borders (when we promised it wouldn't expand eastward) and the NATO military buildup in Ukraine that lead to this war.

NATO's aggression is what has the world on the brink of WW III.

[adorno]

That's a lie as I have proven over and over again.

Bunch of BS! You can't prove that a huge deterrent against aggressive nations is a lie. NATO is there to prevent wars started by hostile nations, like Russia and China. Who the heck gave you you're talking points? Putin?

It's are meddling in Ukraine

That's called, foreign relationships and diplomacy. We do that with just about every country in the world. You make a very lousy student about how the world works.

NATO expanding to Russia's borders (when we promised it wouldn't expand eastward)

Yet, Russia itself at one point wanted to join NATO and was denied. And NATO expansion depends on countries WANTING to join to defend against Russia. Europe and the U.S. don't force NATO expansion, and Russia can't decide on who they will accept joining NATO. Russia cannot decide foreign policy nor defense strategies for European countries. That shouldn't be hare to understand, not even for you.

and the NATO military buildup in Ukraine that lead to this war.

Any buildup in the Ukraine or European forces, is dictated by Russia's threats and the Russian history of aggressive policies and takeovers that they executed in decades past. Luckily for the NATO and European countries that, you have nothing to do with the decisions they make.

NATO's aggression is what has the world on the brink of WW III.

The purpose for NATO is defense, and not for expanding territory nor for invasions, nor for any kind of aggression. Yet, YOUR Russia is he aggressive force that forced NATO expansion. No Russian aggression, no NATO expansion, and perhaps even no need for NATO to exist at all.

WW3 would be a certainty if Russia was allowed to carry on with its aggression and with its expansion. So, you have it the complete opposite of why NATO needed to expand.