‘Disinformation’ expert law professor digs in deeper on Hunter Biden laptop (chicom bribes not mentioned)

The College Fix ^ | 6/13/24 | Dave Huber

[Libloather]

Remember University of Michigan law professor Barb McQuade? She’s a regular “legal analyst” on MSNBC and was but one of many who supported the assertion that Hunter Biden’s laptop was, in her words, “Russia.”

Hilariously, she’s written a book titled “Attack from Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America” the description of which reads “We are strategically being pushed apart by disinformation—the deliberate spreading of lies disguised as truth—and it comes at us from all sides.”

More hilariously, McQuade (pictured) told Rachel Maddow earlier this year that the United States’ “deep commitment” to the First Amendment means there needs to be “common sense” speech restrictions.

She also opined that Donald Trump could be tried for manslaughter for the January 6 “insurrection” at the Capitol.

If you’ve been following Hunter Biden’s trial in Delaware you may have seen the “revelation” many already suspected: that the president’s son’s laptop is, and was, legit after all.

Here’s a quick reminder of what happened during the 2020 presidential campaign:

**SNIP**

Here’s how Professor McQuaid dealt with the news about the laptop’s authenticity:

As noted by @emptywheel, however, questions remain about the chain of custody of the laptop, and [FBI] Agent [Erika] Jensen testified that she was unable to say whether the laptop was tampered with before the FBI obtained it.

And, as @AshaRangappa has noted, even if the content was authentic, it still may have been a Russian influence operation, just like the DNC hack-and-leak operation, designed to sow discord. If so, mission accomplished!

[Libloather]

Maybe Trump can mention the bribe loot during the debate.

[DIRTYSECRET]

Trump expressed enough empathy for Hunter’s drug problem. That’s honey. You are vinegar.

[rlmorel]

Holy Smokes. Talk about doubling down on stupid.

[econjack]

How does the First Amendment square with the concept of “common sense” speech restrictions? Or, is this just more MSNBC gobbledygook?

[Steve_Seattle]

"She also opined that Donald Trump could be tried for manslaughter for the January 6 “insurrection” at the Capitol."

The only people who died were Trump supporters, two or three as a result of police action, one or two for medical reasons. This professor doesn't even know the basic facts. She's a clown.

[BatGuano]

Barb? An Expert Law professor? Digging deeper into a laptop that she has labeled, “Russia?” She is not a computer expert?
So,
I will believe everything she mentions from now on.?

NOPE!

[dragnet2]

More hilariously, McQuade told Rachel Maddow earlier this year that the United States’ “deep commitment” to the First Amendment means there needs to be “common sense” speech restrictions.

Writing a funnier deadpan comedy skit than this would be difficult.☺

[cuz1961]

i dont know if its just cuz ive been listening to some Dougie Corrado spooky stories youtube vids,,,

,, but the crazy coming off the left is really beginning to give me the creeps...

...its like everyone on the left is becoming demon possessed ...

...zombies who have zero self awareness , or maybe just no concern about the in our face off the charts evil lies and actions of theirs. .

[cuz1961]

( specificaly,

We shouldn’t have helped the woman at the river..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snxDDA4w3rw&t=2075s&pp=2AGbEJACAQ%3D%3D /-)

[catnipman]

“More hilariously, McQuade (pictured) told Rachel Maddow earlier this year that the United States’ “deep commitment” to the First Amendment means there needs to be “common sense” speech restrictions.”

McQuade later added, “We must DESTROY the First Amendment to SAVE the First Amendment.”