I don’t even know where to begin. There are so many levels of being wrong on both facts and law that it would take hours to unpack and refute.
It’s like trying to refute an astronomy paper that starts off with assuming a flat earth and the stars being crystal spheres…
Is it okay to say what’s wrong with this declaration but not say what’s wrong with the country? Because that’s what this testimony does. Very soon that will be against the “law.” We already have one unchallenged political prison here - that we know of. I think we should learn how we got here and do something about it before that happens.