Replies

I read that Alex Jones was sued into oblivion, lost the case, and has to sell/liquidate all assets except his personal home to settle the billion dollar judgement. I learned that the basis for the lawsuit was that he denied that any children had died in the Sandy Hook shooting. In the course of his defense, he corrected himself and said he now believes that children did die in the shooting. Has anyone read his explanation as to why he made that claim in the first place?

It may have been wiser for him to have stuck with the theory that the shooter was CIA-recruited and coached, but maybe he didn’t know/think of that. Isn’t that the prevailing wisdom about most of the mass shootings? And one other question - if he works for Mossad, as some people speculate, is he really in any jeopardy? We here know that the real reason he’s being shut down is his messaging influence. I expect he’ll just become a permanent free guest on other people’s shows. He can still get his message out but won’t have any earnings that can be taken.

There were some really wonky things about the Sandy Hook shooting, including crisis actors. Heck, I’ve seen video where one of the “parents” was laughing until he stepped up to a microphone and puckered himself up in the “grieving dad” act. How is anybody to know what is real and what isn’t in such a situation?

I didn’t follow his trial. Did they prove exactly what children did die?

Did they prove any actual harm done to any family as a result of Jones’s statements? Were any families denied life insurance payouts, for instance, because of his statements? What is the actual harm cited? Did any family try to mitigate damage by simply stepping forward and pointing out that their child had died?

The problem with him becoming a free guest on others’ shows is that it denies him a livelihood. A person who goes through bankruptcy doesn’t lose their ability to have a livelihood. This is like a bankrupt pianist being forced to amputate all his fingers. How can this be legal? We don’t have licenses to speak, or licenses to be paid for speaking. It’s not like they can revoke his license. So on what basis could they forbid him from earning money for his future speaking? Why couldn’t he set up a new company just like the old one and continue on as before?

Or - conversely - why hasn’t the entire MSM been bankrupted and banned from any future earnings for their lies about “Russia collusion”?

I didn’t really get into the Sandy Hook investigations at the time because I was involved in researching Obama’s documentation problems. But from looking at this just now I find a site where some of the anomalies are checked out: https://rumble.com/vqbr7g-we-need-to-talk-about-sandy-hook.html

One of the things in there is documentation that the photo that is claimed to be of a 6-year-old Noah Posner who was killed in Sandy Hook is actually on his mother’s relative’s page where he is called Kevin and the photo is said to be 10 years old. So what was given as a photo for a child allegedly killed in Sandy Hook is actually an old photo of a child who was at the time 16 years old.

There’s a lot of interesting stuff in there, which I haven’t gone through all the way yet.

The introduction was interesting too - noting that until the Sandy Hook event, the claim to fame for that area was a facility with underground tunnels that did macabre psychological experiments Somebody in that area has some know-how that could have been extremely valuable for such an “event”.

The part I’m looking at right now is talking about how many of the alleged parents are actually actors/entertainers. The above-mentioned mother is actually not an oncology nurse as claimed in the media but a gun-control advocate for the Swiss government.

So, in answer to your question about why Alex Jones claimed there weren’t any deaths, it’s probably because there was quite a bit of evidence that suggested what was being brought forth as evidence that there WERE deaths is actually fabricated.

I looked at the section in that link where it compares the after-action records to the actual surveillance footage. Where the records claim that students were frantically being evacuated the actual footage shows NOTHING happening.

One of the “parents” has a company that removes “libelous” claims, criminal records, etc from the internet. I don’t know if he owned that company before Sandy Hook; the intimation in the video is that his company would have been useful to remove from the web information about the criminal backgrounds of people used as “witnesses”, etc.

What I know is that the same process that is being used to put “election deniers” in jail or to bankrupt them, or to stage an “insurrection” whereby all who consider the evidence regarding election fraud in 2020 are considered kooks... was used to also silence any questioning of Sandy Hook, even though there is credible evidence that raises serious questions. This is Goebbels on steroids, and our country is on a bad, bad course while this is allowed to happen.