Regarding the issue of ID numbers on Q drops, Q never used ID numbers for authenticity. Instead Q specifically identified TRIPCODE as a mark of authenticity. The Anons on the chans/Kun know this, so I am sorry to say I have lost faith in them. These agitators/anonymous anons are ignoring what they know, and what Q stated clearly, and are insisting they, as outside sources, should be regarded as superior sources, not Q.
There are 6 Q drops using the word tripcode.
Q3620, Q3619, Q1835, Q1438, Q962, Q961
Exerpt of Q1438
Q1835 says, "TRIPCODE compromised". There are no Q drops with the phrase, "ID compromised." I believe the 'TRIPCODE compromised' came from the time Q intentionally exposed the tripcode to see who would grab it and post.
However, there was a previous false claim by 'anons' that the TRIPCODE had been compromised.
Again, the ANons know the TRIPCODE is the authentication tool and unfortunately are working to shift authentication to the ID. The Tripcodes are (naturally) not displayed on the aggregators. Based on the determined attempts to portray 'everything past 2020' as fake, I will no longer believe anything anons or the Board owner(s) say about changes to the Tripcode or similar issues (the salt, encryption code).
Q/Q+ are in control and would advise us as to the authenticity of drops if 'everything after 2020 was fake.' The fact that Q has not refuted the latest attempts to claim 'fake Q' means we have matured, no longer need that kind of coaching, and are 'noticing' amazing changes occurring which validate Q.
I've posted about the Ascension and the Ukraine drops.
When the most recent, post-2020, Ukrainian drop (4959) first arrived, I remarked that I had not been engaging trolls on that topic because I little depth on the Ukraine, but that I could do better, and so I did. The Ukraine drop was important and timely. In 2024, it's now obvious that NATO has drained it's weapons, the Ukraine is running out of conscripts and NATO continues to prop up the Ukraine as a means of starting WWIII. This is an important, worthwhile issue. NATO plans are no longer even passably feasible, and yet they double down. Before that Q4959, 'the narrative' was in much greater control in the forums and on the MSM. With the work of a mighty force of FReepers, and Anons around the world, the Ukrainian 'messaging' is on the run, and NATO's Ukraine war is dying.
There are some signs that NATO itself is on the ropes, with one member country stating that they did not support NATO's Ukrainian agenda, a first as far as some observers know. That detail was provided in a video by John Mearsheimer and I shared that link via FReepmail to a group which posts on the Ukraine. After posting it, the video now is flagged private and you have to have permission to view it. Those who post videos on Youtube, or Youtube itself, can view the origin of links (coming from Freerepublic.com) and perhaps TPTB objected to FR linking to it. Fewer FReepers, FReeQs and anons were paying attention to the Ukraine aside from MSM articles, then Q dropped about the Ukraine and so those who read Q at least turned to look, and some became active. And some FReepers are always digging behind the scenes and didn't believe the MSM assertions.
I've written my opinions/theories about the Ukraine AFTER, Q's drop (#2,188, #1,862); If accurate then I can understand another reason why Q might point to the 'keystone'. Note that that there are 32 drops on the board for the word 'Ukraine' (e.g., drops about the Impeachment of President Trump etc.); it's not odd that the post-2020 Q drop, Q4959 arrived 2 days before the midterm elections, and that it once again returned to the subject of the Ukraine.
I and two other FReeQs recall checking Trump's feed to make sure his retruth (now deleted) incorporating Q4961 was actually on his feed at the time. Trump's reTruth included the text from Q4961.
I believe there was another Trump retruth which confirmed he supports these post 2020 drops, I just can't recall which one it was.
The assertion by some that Q's link to the video "We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore' (Q4953) is a 'farewell video' strikes me as contrary to everything we've posted it about since the beginning. Besides, that song was Trump's campaign music until the artists objected; playing it at Trump's campaign meetings was not Trump's 'Farewell'.
Trump's A NATION IN DECLINE video is similar in content (montage of abuses of the left/cabal) and his implicit promise he will not give up. Paul Geddes has a video showing a montage of abuses to underscore the reason for Q and the Storm.
I've just read the post-2020 Q drops again, and they sure don't sound like Watkins. I don't believe 'a guy who sells t-shirts and honey' really would take on Q or triumph over Q's purpose and cyber expertise. If anything, this 'fake Q drops' movement seems to be using this 'fake' issue as a backhanded effort to discredit him. Assertions that he wrote post 2020-drops are as believable (to me) as those about 'Microchip' and 'Babyfist'. The content of some of the latter drops largely seems to be a recap for those who joined Q later in the awakening and aren't going to go back 5 years or so to catch them up and focus us all.
I just searched the word 'trust' on Qalerts.com and reviewed all 182 drops with that word. Q's most common directive includes Trust the Plan, Trust yoursevles, and Trust the Lord. There are zero instances wherein Q directs us to Trust the boards/board owners/anons.
The fact that I may be wrong about 'Ascension' or anything else is not Q's fault or does not prove Q is fake post-2020. Sometimes we don't understand Q drops long past their drop date, even before 2020, but that doesn't mean they are fake. I've yet to see any evidence that Q 'left' in 2020 and no evidence all future drops were fakes. This 'movement' claiming Q drops are fake will go the way of 'Microchip' and 'BabyFist' in the end.
Now that I've stopped writing on this topic (for now), I discovered Yantis already nailed this one to the wall. "It's dead, Jim."
I'll post mine anyway, as it is a less technical take on the 'fake' issue.
