You have still lost, and very early on in this. You have offered nothing to change that.
Sorry, but you are the one that started this discussion. Therefore, you do not get to make the claim without proof.
Not one person will stand with you.
I on the other hand provided a link that proves that the judge himself wrote a letter that confirmed a message was left the day before the verdict was announced, that claims the person leaving the message is the cousin of a juror who told him the jury had convicted Trump and thanked them for their hard work..
So, we know that the claim is true, that a message had been left at the website of the court involved in the trial.
Only Forbes has written an article that says there is no proof that the person leaving the message is related to a juror or that inside information had been shared. As is the case with any case the burden of the case is that they prove without the shadow of a doubt that this did not occur. They cannot use the excuse that there is no evidence to support that someone just guessed the truth.
That doesn't even begin to debunk the case if that is your source.
We do not know your source, because you refuse to divulge it. Your refusal to provide your source only further negates your claim as being BS.
So, either quit wasting everyone's time & provided the proof, or restate that your statement is your opinion and what your opinion is based on.
Are you a lawyer or judge?
I only ask because plenty of people involved in the profession have stated that this puts the case in real jeopardy. Until they can identify the person who made the post, and verify that he knows no one who is a juror.