To: Jacquerie
This is an informative article, but Parshall's comment about it being the beginning of a Japanese campaign to hide or disguise bad news is a bit ironic.
For three months after the battle, the US's official description of the damage incurred to Yorktown was simply that the ship had suffered "heavy damage".
It was not until September 1942 that she was reported sunk in the battle.
4 posted on
06/04/2024 3:52:40 AM PDT by
Captain Walker
("It is infinitely better to have a few good Men, than many indifferent ones." - George Washington)
To: Captain Walker
Not ironic at all.
Read Shattered Sword.
5 posted on
06/04/2024 4:23:00 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
To: Captain Walker
. . . the US's official description of the damage . . .
That was the official *public* description. The US Navy didn't lie to itself, as the Japanese Navy did. The Japanese government also lied to the Japanese people and claimed that Midway as a victory, etc.
In the absence of hard, verifiable data, the US Navy had a lot of wishful thinking about things like our torpedoes, which were a lot worse than we 'thought', and about Japanese torpedoes, which were a lot better than we thought. But we learned from the battles and got better, while the Japanese kept trying to recreate the Battle of Tsushima and refused to believe any changes in doctrine or tactics were required.
6 posted on
06/04/2024 4:47:07 AM PDT by
Phlyer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson