I’m guessing that everybody on the jury is going to say, “I didn’t understand any of that. What was the crime? And that Cohen guy was clearly lying. I have no idea what we’re doing here. But I think Trump is a jerk, so I’m voting guilty.”
Can someone explain to me how presiding Judge Juan Merchan (third world POS) can give the jury any instructions that could reveal the full nature of the “other crime” if the prosecutors never mentioned let alone FAILED TO PROVE or even identify by name IN OPEN COURT????
Sounds like the instructions will be, “Members of the jury, now that you have heard “something” in this trial, I order you to find the defendant guilty.”
Your theory makes the most sense
The problem has been Hope Hicks.
If the president’s assistant says something and then Cohen corroborates it, then the “star witness’ isn’t Cohen...it’s Hope Hicks. The prosecution is using Hope Hicks’ testimony and having it confirmed by Cohen.
I don’t know why more people aren’t upset with her. She’s the one who put Cohen and Trump in the room together.
I don’t think Trump is going to be convicted, but he really needs to start seriously considering the people he surrounds himself with.
Couldn’t have laid it out better myself. That’s exactly what will happen.
Trump will go to prison for nothing and none of us are going to do anything about it.
I also understand that two of the jurors are themselves attorneys, hopefully they are smart enough to see through the BS. But are they honest enough to do the right thing?
I have been on jury duty 4 times, once as the jury foreman.
YUP, this is how it will probably go down.
Every will talk about how they hate Trump, then say sometihing like I dont know what, but he’s guilty of something. So He’s GUILTY.