So what we have, is a reference in the peer reviewed literature you decree as acceptable, and you ignore it.
Nice attempt at deflecting from being NAILED.
Troll.
Nice try.
If you read my response to Dan, I both acknowledged his contribution and reviewed the article. I explained why two deaths (out of 2.7 million fully vaccinated individuals in Connecticut) are not indicative of general vaccine issues.
But reading comprehension is hard, isn’t it? I guess that’s why you haven’t started on my university-level science textbook reading list yet.