[srmanuel]

In the first picture, you might think maybe NOT GUILTY, in the subsequent pictures, you know it’s GUILTY as charged, might even be a two-bagger.

[JJBookman]

...Yup, guilty as charged

[Ezekiel]

In the first picture, you might think maybe NOT GUILTY, in the subsequent pictures, you know it’s GUILTY as charged, might even be a two-bagger.

Basically a 'reverse beer goggles' effect.

Beret her(?) for many things, but

you can't really fault her for placement in the language department, on demonstrating her qualifications in the immersion method, " the most natural way to learn a language":

‘Can’t f–king touch me’

~ A defiant French teacher...

[lastchance]

Not this sh*&%t again. If attractiveness of the accused is the standard by which we decide guilt or innocence regarding allegations of sexual assault or misconduct perhaps that could be written into statute. Although making it retroactive would be improbable I am sure future attractive men and women who abuse their position of authority to take sexual advantage will appreciate the change, as of course would rapists. Most professional boards could also make amendments to their code of conduct as well

[ridesthemiles]

AIMING hard for a 3 bagger.