Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CDC’s Latest Myocarditis Study is a Con Job
American Thinker ^ | 10 May, 2024 | W.A. Eliot

Posted on 05/10/2024 4:43:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “The point is swine flu was pulled with far fewer side effects or fatalities than the clot shots.”

No, the point is there were no reasons to continue the swine flu vaccination program because there were no incidents of swine flu.

Important Quote: “In the ensuing weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey, the USA or anywhere else in the world.” IOW, there was no pandemic requiring vaccination.

Q: Is the current flu outbreak a replay of the experience of 1976?
A: There are clear parallels and striking distinctions between the situation then and now. In ’76, the virus was detected in a single military installation, at Fort Dix, New Jersey. In the ensuing weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey, the USA or anywhere else in the world. By contrast, today’s H1N1 variant has demonstrated a capacity for multi-generational human-to-human transmission. A second important difference, when it comes to response capacity, is that we now have a wider armamentarium of possible interventions – antiviral medicines in addition to the potential for a vaccine. Third, 9/11 and the anthrax attacks in the USA have led to heightened preparedness for bioterrorism and natural disease outbreaks. The experience of SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] and the global notice of avian influenza have likewise stimulated monitoring capacity, preparedness and international cooperation. The open and prompt reporting of cases – that has been a hallmark of the current episode – stands in contrast to the 2003 SARS experience.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686218/#:~:text=In%20‘76%2C%20the%20virus%20was,anywhere%20else%20in%20the%20world.


41 posted on 05/14/2024 8:18:13 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Sounds like it might be historic revisionism 33 years later; when the profitability of jabs for Big Pharma (everything cured by $$$) was fully ensconsed.

Nice try though.

Hint: You idiots threw away your credibility to the point people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the pharma/govt complex.

Too many examples to list.


42 posted on 05/14/2024 9:01:51 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Owen

...there were essentially no deaths in Asia until variants arrived. The original virus did not kill Japanese or Thais or Koreans. Chinese numbers were not obfuscated, but they did have their own definition of attribuion. Regardless, that virus killed Americans and spared Asia. The mutations stopped sparing Asia.

Nobody wants to examine this. 

 

A real puzzle.

 

Cui bono?

43 posted on 05/14/2024 10:03:30 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “Hint: You idiots threw away your credibility to the point people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the pharma/govt complex.”

Hint: The anti-vaxxer conspiracy idiots threw away their credibility by crying wolf to the point where people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the anti-vaxxers.


44 posted on 05/14/2024 10:05:54 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Now you're reduced to plagiarism and a factually incorrect attempt at the tu quoque fallacy.

Almost forgot.

Because SCIENCE!TM

45 posted on 05/14/2024 11:11:34 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Since plagiarism is the use of another’s work, words, or ideas without attribution and since I provided attribution, it cannot be plagiarism.


46 posted on 05/14/2024 11:47:09 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson