Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/06/2024 Vol.492, Q Day 2383

qalerts.app ^ | 5/6/2024 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity

[bitt]

OOOPS! she described a woman, lol!!

[Oratam]

That’s outside The Tombs (the last known whereabouts of one Jeffrey Epstein), a few blocks from the court room.

[bitt]

“Costello’s testimony is hearsay;”

Costello was giving testimony to a House investigation - it is suggested that he be subpoenaed to testify for Trump’s defense on Monday.... but it looks like they might not need him lol...

[Oratam]

Kansas City is now in the crosshairs of a significant investigation for potential human rights violations following the doxxing of Harrison Butker, the kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs.

+++

Bitt, Thank you very much for posting this because it might otherwise go unnoticed on this thread.

Harrison Butker’s commencement address to the 2024 Graduating Class of Benedictine College: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JS7RIKSaCc

[bitt]

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4238293/posts?page=1

Study Finds Up to a Third of All Non-Citizens in the United States are Illegally Registered to Vote
https://theohiostar.com/ ^ | 5/15/2024 | James Agresti

[bitt]

https://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/4238240/posts?page=1

‘The View’ hosts unload on Chiefs kicker for ‘cult-like’ Catholic faith, say he needs therapy
Fox News (foxnews.com) ^ | 5/16/24 | Gabriel Hays

[bitt]

Report: 39 Secret Service Agents Demand Investigation into Biden’s Marxist DEI Policies Following Unusual Assault by Female Agent on Male Superior

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/report-39-secret-service-agents-demand-investigation-bidens/

[bitt]

https://gab.com/S-Rossi/posts/112416911866902039

If I’m not mistaken, no one—NO ONE—is allowed to leave China without permission. To do so, they must have a valid passport and a visa to the country they wish to “visit.” Don’t kid yourselves, they’re being sent here to spy.

[Farcesensitive]

The tweet is from May 13th.
I’m not sure when the video is from but I think it is recent.

[combat_boots]

Amir

https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/32273

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

Pennsylvania Monument, Gettysburg National Military Park, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania

[bitt]

[bitt]

[bitt]

RUHROH

[Oratam]

I got the audio to go with that image right here: https://youtu.be/ZmH2VS8X2Vg?si=S4HN7J3hrG3GEd2r

[sweetiepiezer]

Friend just texted me and said the whole hearing is something to see.

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

[little jeremiah]

Good night to all FRens, FReeQs, Truth SeeQers, LurQers, Digital Warriors, anons, and all good people; wishing you a peaceful night and good morning. May God's strength protect from harm everyone fighting in this great war between good and evil, and may He give us the determination and courage to hold the line, and never give up or give in.

May you be at peace,
May your heart remain open.
May you awaken to the light
of your own true nature.
May you be healed,
May you be a source of healing for all beings.
Tibetan Buddhist Prayer

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

Driving Dystopia: Eight Automakers Accused of Lying About Customer Data Protections

https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/cars/news-blog/driving-dystopia-eight-automakers-accused-of-lying-about-customer-data-protections-44506987

Excerpt:

Legislators have accused several automakers of betraying their customers by going back on an earlier pledge to protect their data. The brands stated during a congressional inquiry that they would provide information to government officials upon their request, despite having previously signed onto the Consumer Privacy Protection Principles in 2014 where they vowed only to hand over customer data when given a formal court order or search warrant.

.....“Automakers have not only kept consumers in the dark regarding their actual practices, but multiple companies misled consumers for over a decade by failing to honor the industry’s own voluntary privacy principles,” Automotive News quoted the senators as stating in their letter, before asking for an investigation.

The accused companies include Toyota, Nissan, Subaru, Volkswagen, BMW, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz and Kia — which reportedly told lawmakers that they would supply data to police and other government agencies whenever subpoenaed. However, the agreement signed in 2014 expressly forbids this. The Consumer Privacy Protection Principles stipulates that data never be handed over without a warrant issued by a judge.

.....This is hardly the first time we’ve seen companies willing to hand over customer data. Earlier this year, similar allegations were being leveled at General Motors, Honda, Acura, Kia, Hyundai, and Mitsubishi. Those automakers were being accused of selling off data that eventually ended up being held by insurance agencies — with the resulting information being used as an excuse to jack up insurance premiums.

In fact, the Automotive News piece actually noted that GM is currently facing a federal lawsuit that’s seeking class action status. It’s being accused of sharing connected-vehicle data, without direct consent from its customers, with a data broker called LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Data brokers will scoop up just about any information they see as potentially valuable. In this case, they sold it to insurance companies.

.....If the device (cars in this instance) have the ability to monitor and remotely share information, then that’s ultimately what will happen.

As an example, AN noted that government agencies are expressly required to obtain a warrant before they can access a person’s location by pinging their cell phone. The Supreme Court upheld this in 2018. But we know for a fact that this rule gets broken all the time. We have also been inundated with new legislation (starting with the tragically named Patriot Act) that blurs the line regarding what the government can do in terms of data collection.

Protections inside your vehicle are likewise foggy. While your Fourth Amendment rights are supposed to protect you and your property from any unreasonable search or seizures, cars have existed in a gray area for roughly a century. Police can effectively claim they’re launching an investigation based on anything illicit they see (or claim to see) inside the vehicle and can conduct a search without a warrant. But this rule was passed as part of the National Prohibition Act in 1925 and was originally designed to help police catch bootleggers they knew would flee a traffic stop.

We don’t have prohibition anymore. But the law remains in place and has been cited in the past when police are accused of violating the rights of drivers by enacting a search that yielded no results. Technically, they did violate that person’s rights — especially if they couldn’t prove that they were investigating criminal activities. But because a legal precedent was set decades before they were born, the government might decide that’s just fine. Apply that logic to the nearly unlimited amount of data being accumulated in modern vehicles (which now incorporate in-cabin microphones, camera systems, and scoop data from any paired mobile devices) and you might begin to see how big of a problem this is all becoming.