[Alberta's Child]

The EEOC alleges that it is discriminatory since blacks comprised 14.5% of those rejected for this reason versus less than 8% for whites. The EEOC further demands Sheetz offer jobs to all blacks previously denied employment plus back pay and benefits. There is, however, no indication of how many blacks were discriminated against, and Sheetz has denied all wrongdoing.

If I am the legal counsel for Sheetz, the first thing I do is compel the EEOC to turn over the names and identifying information of all the alleged “victims” of this discrimination. Then I go and research their criminal backgrounds. Then I file third-party claims against the prosecutors who pursued those criminal cases, as well as the police who arrested the perps.

If refusing to hire criminals is “discrimination,” then prosecuting people is, too.

[i_robot73]

>
If refusing to hire criminals is “discrimination,” then prosecuting people is, too
>

Excepting that, these days, Leftists don’t prosecute their OWN (IIRC there were > 50 terrorists arrested on campus & immediately let go; though they had broken into & ‘commandeered’ a bldg).

Best to go w/:
- A1S1: ONLY Congress can pass Law
- A1S8: ZERO Const. authority vs. 1st A. Right of association
- 5th A.: Takings, it’s a (private) biz. Don’t like it? Don’t patronize ‘em. (back to 1st A.)
- Contracts Clause